Abstract:A key promise of democratic voting is that, by accounting for all constituents' preferences, it produces decisions that benefit the constituency overall. It is alarming, then, that all deterministic voting rules have unbounded distortion: all such rules - even under reasonable conditions - will sometimes select outcomes that yield essentially no value for constituents. In this paper, we show that this problem is mitigated by voters being public-spirited: that is, when deciding how to rank alternatives, voters weigh the common good in addition to their own interests. We first generalize the standard voting model to capture this public-spirited voting behavior. In this model, we show that public-spirited voting can substantially - and in some senses, monotonically - reduce the distortion of several voting rules. Notably, these results include the finding that if voters are at all public-spirited, some voting rules have constant distortion in the number of alternatives. Further, we demonstrate that these benefits are robust to adversarial conditions likely to exist in practice. Taken together, our results suggest an implementable approach to improving the welfare outcomes of elections: democratic deliberation, an already-mainstream practice that is believed to increase voters' public spirit.

Should Politicians be Informed? Targeted Benefits and Heterogeneous Voters

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Voters and the trade-off between policy stability and responsiveness

Making Policies Matter: Voter Responses to Campaign Promises

The Politics of Personalized News Aggregation

Public Information Is an Incentive for Politicians: Experimental Evidence from Delhi Elections

Microtargeting, voters’ unawareness, and democracy

Income inequality, voters' support for public spending and the size of the welfare state. A simple political model

The public provision of goods in democracies: Do age and inequality matter?

The Politics of Attention

Monopoly agenda control with privately informed voters

Candidate Incentive Distributions: How voting methods shape electoral incentives

Inferring Population Preferences via Mixtures of Spatial Voting Models

Optimal Policymaking under Yardstick Vote: an Experimental Study

VOTING AND SOCIAL PRESSURE UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION

Modeling Peoples Voting Behavior with Poll Information

Transparency and Policymaking with Endogenous Information Provision

Epistemic Selection of Costly Alternatives: The Case of Participatory Budgeting

Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting

Policy Targeting under Network Interference

Robustness of voting mechanisms to external information in expectation