Abstract:AI-based social media platforms has already transformed the nature of economic and social interaction. AI enables the massive scale and highly personalized nature of online information sharing that we now take for granted. Extensive attention has been devoted to the polarization that social media platforms appear to facilitate. However, a key implication of the transformation we are experiencing due to these AI-powered platforms has received much less attention: how platforms impact what observers of online discourse come to believe about community views. These observers include policymakers and legislators, who look to social media to gauge the prospects for policy and legislative change, as well as developers of AI models trained on large-scale internet data, whose outputs may similarly reflect a distorted view of public opinion. In this paper, we present a nested game-theoretic model to show how observed online opinion is produced by the interaction of the decisions made by users about whether and with what rhetorical intensity to share their opinions on a platform, the efforts of organizations (such as traditional media and advocacy organizations) that seek to encourage or discourage opinion-sharing online, and the operation of AI-powered recommender systems controlled by social media platforms. We show that signals from ideological organizations encourage an increase in rhetorical intensity, leading to the 'rational silence' of moderate users. This, in turn, creates a polarized impression of where average opinions lie. We also show that this observed polarization can also be amplified by recommender systems that encourage the formation of communities online that end up seeing a skewed sample of opinion. We also identify practical strategies platforms can implement, such as reducing exposure to signals from ideological organizations and a tailored approach to content moderation.

The Politics of Personalized News Aggregation

The Politics of Attention

Information Revelation and Pandering in Elections

Opinion Formation under Antagonistic Influences

Political Polarization in Online News Consumption

The Opinion Factor: The Effects of Opinionated News on Information Processing and Attitude Change

Beyond partisan filters: Can underreported news reduce issue polarization?

Social Media Algorithms Can Shape Affective Polarization via Exposure to Antidemocratic Attitudes and Partisan Animosity

A Rational Inattention Theory of Echo Chamber

Rational Silence and False Polarization: How Viewpoint Organizations and Recommender Systems Distort the Expression of Public Opinion

Persuading the Enemy: Estimating the Persuasive Effects of Partisan Media with the Preference-Incorporating Choice and Assignment Design

Polarization, Abstention, and the Median Voter Theorem

Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Attention

Political Awareness, Microtargeting of Voters, and Negative Electoral Campaigning

Incidental Exposure and News Engagement: Testing Temporal Order and the Role of Political Interest

Divide and Diverge: Polarization Incentives

Do you really believe that? The effect of economic incentives on the acceptance of real-world data in a polarized context

Exposure to Extremely Partisan News from the Other Political Side Shows Scarce Boomerang Effects

News Media as Suppliers of Narratives (and Information)

Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?

The Evolution Model of Polarized News Based on Complex Network