Abstract:AI-based social media platforms has already transformed the nature of economic and social interaction. AI enables the massive scale and highly personalized nature of online information sharing that we now take for granted. Extensive attention has been devoted to the polarization that social media platforms appear to facilitate. However, a key implication of the transformation we are experiencing due to these AI-powered platforms has received much less attention: how platforms impact what observers of online discourse come to believe about community views. These observers include policymakers and legislators, who look to social media to gauge the prospects for policy and legislative change, as well as developers of AI models trained on large-scale internet data, whose outputs may similarly reflect a distorted view of public opinion. In this paper, we present a nested game-theoretic model to show how observed online opinion is produced by the interaction of the decisions made by users about whether and with what rhetorical intensity to share their opinions on a platform, the efforts of organizations (such as traditional media and advocacy organizations) that seek to encourage or discourage opinion-sharing online, and the operation of AI-powered recommender systems controlled by social media platforms. We show that signals from ideological organizations encourage an increase in rhetorical intensity, leading to the 'rational silence' of moderate users. This, in turn, creates a polarized impression of where average opinions lie. We also show that this observed polarization can also be amplified by recommender systems that encourage the formation of communities online that end up seeing a skewed sample of opinion. We also identify practical strategies platforms can implement, such as reducing exposure to signals from ideological organizations and a tailored approach to content moderation.

Rational Silence and False Polarization: How Viewpoint Organizations and Recommender Systems Distort the Expression of Public Opinion

Filter Bubbles and the Unfeeling: How AI for Social Media Can Foster Extremism and Polarization

Social Media Algorithms Can Shape Affective Polarization via Exposure to Antidemocratic Attitudes and Partisan Animosity

Can Few Lines of Code Change Society ? Beyond fack-checking and moderation : how recommender systems toxifies social networking sites

The drivers of online polarization: fitting models to data

Mass media impact on opinion evolution in biased digital environments: a bounded confidence model

The Echo chamber-driven Polarization on Social Media

Designing Recommender Systems to Depolarize

Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion polarization: A bounded confidence model

Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion fragmentation and polarization: A bounded confidence model

The Evolution of Conformity, Malleability, and Influence in Simulated Online Agents

AI Within Online Discussions: Rational, Civil, Privileged?

Partisan Asymmetries in Exposure to Misinformation

Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study

The complex link between filter bubbles and opinion polarization

Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users

Social media battle for attention: opinion dynamics on competing networks

Polarized Speech on Online Platforms in the American Political Context

Perspective-taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Media

Who Sets the Agenda on Social Media? Ideology and Polarization in Online Debates