Abstract:Political polarization has become a growing concern in democratic societies, as it drives tribal alignments and erodes civic deliberation among citizens. Given its prevalence across different countries, previous research has sought to understand under which conditions people tend to endorse extreme opinions. However, in polarized contexts, citizens not only adopt more extreme views but also become correlated across issues that are, a priori, seemingly unrelated. This phenomenon, known as "ideological sorting", has been receiving greater attention in recent years but the micro-level mechanisms underlying its emergence remain poorly understood. Here, we study the conditions under which a social dynamic system is expected to become ideologically sorted as a function of the mechanisms of interaction between its individuals. To this end, we developed and analyzed a multidimensional agent-based model that incorporates two mechanisms: homophily (where people tend to interact with those holding similar opinions) and pairwise-coherence favoritism (where people tend to interact with ingroups holding politically coherent opinions). We numerically integrated the model's master equations that perfectly describe the system's dynamics and found that ideological sorting only emerges in models that include pairwise-coherence favoritism. We then compared the model's outcomes with empirical data from 24,035 opinions across 67 topics and found that pairwise-coherence favoritism is significantly present in datasets that measure political attitudes but absent across topics not considered related to politics. Overall, this work combines theoretical approaches from system dynamics with model-based analyses of empirical data to uncover a potential mechanism underlying the pervasiveness of ideological sorting.

Divide and Diverge: Polarization Incentives

Opinion Polarization by Learning from Social Feedback

Polarization and Consensus in a Voter Model under Time-Fluctuating Influences

Influencing a Polarized and Connected Legislature

Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides

Polarization, Abstention, and the Median Voter Theorem

Biased Assimilation, Homophily and the Dynamics of Polarization

Competing Activists--Political Polarization

Beyond the Median Voter: How Affective Polarization Shapes Party Polarization in Multidimensional Ideological Spaces

Unanimity, Coexistence and Rigidity: Three Sides of Polarization

Inequality, Identity, and Partisanship: How redistribution can stem the tide of mass polarization

How to Quantify Polarization in Models of Opinion Dynamics

Candidate Incentive Distributions: How voting methods shape electoral incentives

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

Do you really believe that? The effect of economic incentives on the acceptance of real-world data in a polarized context

Why are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A "Satisficing" Dynamical Model

Preventing extreme polarization of political attitudes

Inevitability of Polarization in Geometric Opinion Exchange

Attraction by pairwise coherence explains the emergence of ideological sorting

Paths to Polarization: How Extreme Views, Miscommunication, and Random Chance Drive Opinion Dynamics

Mapping Election Polarization and Competitiveness using Election Results