Abstract:We focus on the scenario in which an agent can exploit his information advantage to manipulate the outcome of an election. In particular, we study district-based elections with two candidates, in which the winner of the election is the candidate that wins in the majority of the districts. District-based elections are adopted worldwide (e.g., UK and USA) and are a natural extension of widely studied voting mechanisms (e.g., k-voting and plurality voting). We resort to the Bayesian persuasion framework, where the manipulator (sender) strategically discloses information to the voters (receivers) that update their beliefs rationally. We study both private signaling in which the sender can use a private communication channel per receiver and public signaling in which the sender can use a single communication channel for all the receivers. Furthermore, for the first time, we introduce semi-public signaling in which the sender can use a single communication channel per district. We show that there is a sharp distinction between private and (semi-)public signaling. In particular, optimal private signaling schemes can provide an arbitrarily better probability of victory than (semi-)public ones and can be computed efficiently, while optimal (semi-)public signaling schemes cannot be approximated to within any factor in polynomial time unless P=NP. However, we show that reasonable relaxations allow the design of multi-criteria PTASs for optimal (semi-)public signaling schemes. In doing so, we introduce a novel property, namely comparative stability, and we design a bi-criteria PTAS for public signaling in general Bayesian persuasion problems beyond elections when the sender's utility function is state-dependent.

Making Policies Matter: Voter Responses to Campaign Promises

Good Politicians: Experimental Evidence on Motivations for Political Candidacy and Government Performance

Electoral Dividends from Programmatic Policies: A Theoretical Proposal Based on the Brazilian Case

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Should Politicians be Informed? Targeted Benefits and Heterogeneous Voters

Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Voters and the trade-off between policy stability and responsiveness

The Unintended Effects of Bottom-Up Accountability: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Peru

Public Information Is an Incentive for Politicians: Experimental Evidence from Delhi Elections

Democratic Policy Decisions with Decentralized Promises Contingent on Vote Outcome

Punching above One's Weight–On Overcommitment in Election Campaigns

Self-signaling in voting

Pro-sociality of local democratic leaders: The impact and dynamics of being elected ⊥

Pandering in a Flexible Representative Democracy

Network Strategies in Election Campaigns

Debates: Voting and Expenditure Responses to Political Communication

Mass Political Information on Social Media: Facebook Ads, Electorate Saturation, and Electoral Accountability in Mexico

Place-Based Imagery and Voter Evaluations: Experimental Evidence on the Politics of Place

Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting

Paving the road to re-election

Persuading Voters in District-based Elections