Abstract:Numerous recent studies show that sharing politician or bureaucrat performance information with voters seldom succeeds at generating bottom-up pressure. One explanation is that local politics in developing democracies are typically mediated through local "development broker" elites, who often lack critical procedural information. Does supplying local leaders with information about decentralized political processes allow them to participate more effectively, generate accountability pressure, and improve public goods provision? A randomized field experiment in Peru demonstrates that information can indeed provoke attitudinal and behavioral change among village elites regarding participation, government performance and protest, but often in unanticipated ways. The study finds that training workshops in fact reduce participation in local participatory budgeting processes, reduce satisfaction with mayors, and increase support for protest and recall elections. Aggregate behavioral measures find a reduction in participatory budgeting attendance, but no changes in the probability of protest or recall initiation. Although village leaders are frustrated with mayoral performance, they struggle to generate collective action and thus have to settle for withdrawing from processes they can leave unilaterally. A test of mechanisms indicates this is not driven primarily by rent-seeking. There are no overall effects on district government performance in the following year. The evidence indicates that information can prompt local leaders to make political moves, but the high costs of collection action makes it difficult to produce meaningful change in politician behavior.

Good Politicians: Experimental Evidence on Motivations for Political Candidacy and Government Performance

Making Policies Matter: Voter Responses to Campaign Promises

Public Information Is an Incentive for Politicians: Experimental Evidence from Delhi Elections

The determinants of political selection: a citizen-candidate model with valence signaling and incumbency advantage

Do Motivated Public Servants Behave More Ethically?

Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Pro-sociality of local democratic leaders: The impact and dynamics of being elected ⊥

The Unelected Hand? Bureaucratic Influence and Electoral Accountability

How Leadership and Public Service Motivation Enhance Innovative Behavior

Politicians' high-status signals make less-educated citizens more supportive of aggression against government: A video-vignette survey experiment

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Sustaining Honesty in Public Service: The Role of Selection

Purposive motivation in an Unlikely place: A study of party activists in Ukraine

Varieties of Experiences: How Do Leaders’ Public-Sector Experiences Matter for Economic Performance?

Motivating political support with group-based rewards

Political Skills and Perceived Employability: Exploring the Mediating Role of Career Self-efficacy

‘Politics is social work with power’: training social workers for elected office

The Unintended Effects of Bottom-Up Accountability: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Peru

Politics matter: Public leadership and taking charge behavior in the public sector

Social workers in politics–a qualitative analysis of factors influencing social workers’ decision to run for political office

Bureaucratic Capability and Political Opportunism: An Empirical Investigation of City Officials in China