Expatiation on several questions of Lenin’s theory ——Response to The Discussion

Yu Liangzao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.2006.02.006
2006-01-01
Abstract:The base of Liwen’s mistakes on Lenin’s theory refers to the distinguishing of “socialist revolution” into “the revolution on the purpose of politics” and “the revolution on the purpose of socialism”. He evites on the process of discoursing and the material used is regardless of whether is right or not, and criticizes the conclusion directly. This is not according with the police of scholastic pursuit, thus the criticism is weak. The material he used, namely the quotations of Lenin, has been quoted, or has been familiar by related scholars, or has no reflection towards the thesis. Without using the new points thought out by the author himself through researching Lenin’s work, out of question, the argumentation is weak. What is more, it doesn’t mean that he has done research on Lenin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?