Abstract:Statement of problem: Stereolithography (SLA) additive manufacturing (AM) technologies can be selected to fabricate zirconia crowns; however, the internal and marginal discrepancies associated with these new technologies remain unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the marginal and internal discrepancies of milled and AM zirconia crowns by using the silicone replica technique. Material and methods: An implant custom abutment was manufactured and scanned by using a laboratory scanner (CARES Software; Institut Straumann AG). An anatomic contour crown was digitally designed, and the standard tessellation language (STLC) file was obtained. The STLC file was splinted into 2 pieces, simulating the parts of the crown that would replace the enamel (STLG1 file) and dentin (STLG2 file) structures. Three groups were determined: anatomic contour zirconia milled (CNC group), AM anatomic contour zirconia (AM group), and AM splinted zirconia (SAM group). For the CNC group, the STLC file was used to manufacture milled (CARES zirconium-dioxide crown; Institut Straumann AG) zirconia specimens. For the AM group, the STLC file was used to additively fabricate (CERAMAKER 900; 3DCeram Co) the zirconia (3DMix ZrO2 paste; 3DCeram Co) specimens. For the SAM group, the STLG2 file was selected to AM (CERAMAKER 900; 3DCeram Co) the zirconia (3DMix ZrO2 paste; 3DCeram Co) specimens. Ten specimens per group were manufactured. The silicone replica technique was used to measure the marginal and internal discrepancies. The cement gap was measured on images captured by using a digital microscope at ×100 magnification. For the internal gap, 50 measurements were made for each specimen, and for the marginal gap, 25 measurements were made for each specimen. The normality test, Shapiro-Wilk test, was conducted. The results indicated that the distributions were not normal; therefore, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H and pairwise Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between marginal and internal discrepancies in all 3 groups. Results: Significant differences were found in marginal and internal discrepancies among the groups. The CNC group had the least marginal and internal discrepancies compared with the AM and SAM groups. The SAM group had significantly lower values for marginal and internal discrepancies than the AM group. The AM group showed the highest marginal and internal discrepancies. The CNC group had a weak correlation coefficient of 0.13 (P=.046), the AM group had a moderate correlation coefficient of 0.32 (P<.001), and the SAM group had a nonsignificant correlation coefficient of 0.12 (P=.051). Conclusions: CNC and SAM groups had clinically acceptable marginal and internal discrepancies, while the AM group had a clinically unacceptable marginal and internal crown discrepancies. Furthermore, a weak correlation was encountered between the marginal and internal discrepancies measured in all groups.

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Marginal Adaptation among Three All-Ceramic Crown Systems

Three-dimensional Fit of Self-Glazed Zirconia Monolithic Crowns Fabricated by Wet Deposition

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Comparation of marginal and internal adaption of endocrowns made from three different ceramics in vitro

Evaluation on the Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crown

Three-dimensional assessment of internal adaptation measurement of three cad/cam ceramic systems

Clinical Marginal and Internal Fit of Crowns Fabricated Using Different CAD/CAM Technologies

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Internal Adaptations of Crowns Cast from Resin Patterns Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer- Assisted Manufacturing Technologies

Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Crowns Fabricated with Three Different Zirconia CAD/CAM Materials

[The Effect of Tooth Preparation Design on the CEREC All-Ceramic Crown's Marginal Adaptation].

Digital Evaluation of Absolute Marginal Discrepancy: A Comparison of Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Conventional and Digital Techniques

Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study

Comparison of marginal fit of gold electroforming-ceramic crown,high gold alloy-ceramic crown and nickel chromium alloy-ceramic crown

Study on the Effect of Different Impression Methods on the Marginal Fit of All-Ceramic Crowns

Clinical evaluation of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with three different CAD-CAM systems

Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses

Marginal adaptation of crown by national CAD/CAM

Marginal discrepancy of 3-unit Co-Cr metal copings fabricated with additive and subtractive manners: A comparative study

Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA) additively manufactured zirconia crowns

Comparison of wear and marginal fitness of 3D-printed deciduous molar crowns: An in vitro study

EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND FIT ACCURACY OF THREE TYPES OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED CROWNS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY