Abstract:Statement of problem: Stereolithography (SLA) additive manufacturing (AM) technologies can be selected to fabricate zirconia crowns; however, the internal and marginal discrepancies associated with these new technologies remain unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the marginal and internal discrepancies of milled and AM zirconia crowns by using the silicone replica technique. Material and methods: An implant custom abutment was manufactured and scanned by using a laboratory scanner (CARES Software; Institut Straumann AG). An anatomic contour crown was digitally designed, and the standard tessellation language (STLC) file was obtained. The STLC file was splinted into 2 pieces, simulating the parts of the crown that would replace the enamel (STLG1 file) and dentin (STLG2 file) structures. Three groups were determined: anatomic contour zirconia milled (CNC group), AM anatomic contour zirconia (AM group), and AM splinted zirconia (SAM group). For the CNC group, the STLC file was used to manufacture milled (CARES zirconium-dioxide crown; Institut Straumann AG) zirconia specimens. For the AM group, the STLC file was used to additively fabricate (CERAMAKER 900; 3DCeram Co) the zirconia (3DMix ZrO2 paste; 3DCeram Co) specimens. For the SAM group, the STLG2 file was selected to AM (CERAMAKER 900; 3DCeram Co) the zirconia (3DMix ZrO2 paste; 3DCeram Co) specimens. Ten specimens per group were manufactured. The silicone replica technique was used to measure the marginal and internal discrepancies. The cement gap was measured on images captured by using a digital microscope at ×100 magnification. For the internal gap, 50 measurements were made for each specimen, and for the marginal gap, 25 measurements were made for each specimen. The normality test, Shapiro-Wilk test, was conducted. The results indicated that the distributions were not normal; therefore, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H and pairwise Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between marginal and internal discrepancies in all 3 groups. Results: Significant differences were found in marginal and internal discrepancies among the groups. The CNC group had the least marginal and internal discrepancies compared with the AM and SAM groups. The SAM group had significantly lower values for marginal and internal discrepancies than the AM group. The AM group showed the highest marginal and internal discrepancies. The CNC group had a weak correlation coefficient of 0.13 (P=.046), the AM group had a moderate correlation coefficient of 0.32 (P<.001), and the SAM group had a nonsignificant correlation coefficient of 0.12 (P=.051). Conclusions: CNC and SAM groups had clinically acceptable marginal and internal discrepancies, while the AM group had a clinically unacceptable marginal and internal crown discrepancies. Furthermore, a weak correlation was encountered between the marginal and internal discrepancies measured in all groups.

Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Crowns Fabricated with Three Different Zirconia CAD/CAM Materials

Three-dimensional Fit of Self-Glazed Zirconia Monolithic Crowns Fabricated by Wet Deposition

Effect of Machining Method and Margin Design on the Accuracy and Margin Quality of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND FIT ACCURACY OF THREE TYPES OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED CROWNS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY

Marginal, internal fit and microleakage of zirconia infrastructures: an in-vitro study

The effect of cement and impression methods on the marginal and internal adaptation of the current monolithic blocks - 3D scanning evaluation

An In Vitro Scanning Electronic Microscope Evaluation

Marginal Fit and Internal Adaptation of Monolithic Zirconia 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis: In Vitro Study

Evaluation on the Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crown

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Internal Adaptations of Crowns Cast from Resin Patterns Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer- Assisted Manufacturing Technologies

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Marginal Adaptation among Three All-Ceramic Crown Systems

Comparation of marginal and internal adaption of endocrowns made from three different ceramics in vitro

The effect of two preparation designs on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of two types of ceramic crowns using CAD/CAM technology (In vitro study)

Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA) additively manufactured zirconia crowns

Effects of design software program and manufacturing method on the marginal and internal adaptation of esthetic crowns for primary teeth: A microcomputed tomography evaluation

Strength and Adaptation of Stereolithography-Fabricated Zirconia Dental Crowns: an in Vitro Study

Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging

Evaluation of Cervical Margin Relocation for CAD/CAM Zirconia Crowns Using Different Composite Resin Materials and Cavity Designs: Marginal Gap and Microleakage

Internal fit and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns with custom-milled screw-channels on Titanium-base: in-vitro study

The Impact of Open versus Closed Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Systems on the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Single Crowns Evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy: A Comparative In Vitro Study