Abstract:Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.

DOUBLE LENGTH ARTIFICIAL REGRESSIONS FOR TESTING SPATIAL DEPENDENCE

Double-Length Regression Tests for Testing Functional Forms and Spatial Error Dependence

Nonlinearity and Spatial Lag Dependence: Tests Based on Double-Length Regressions

Double-length Regressions for the Box–Cox Difference Model with Heteroskedasticity or Autocorrelation

Local Linear M‐estimation in Non‐parametric Spatial Regression

Spatial Unit Roots and Spurious Regression

To use, or not to use the spatial Durbin model? – that is the question

Spatial Regression Models: A Systematic Comparison of Different Model Specifications Using Monte Carlo Experiments

Research on the Validity of Bootstrap LM-Error Test in Spatial Random Effect Models

A New Test for ARCH Effects and Its Finite-Sample Performance

Consistent Specification Testing under Spatial Dependence

Spatial Autocorrelation Approaches to Testing Residuals from Least Squares Regression.

Detection of Spatial Heterogeneity Based on Spatial Autoregressive Varying Coefficient Models

Heteroskedasticity Robust Specification Testing In Spatial Autoregression

Two-stage Estimators for Spatial Confounding

LM tests for spatial correlation in spatial models with limited dependent variables

Regularized Estimation in High-Dimensional Vector Auto-Regressive Models using Spatio-Temporal Information

Tests for Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity in Spatially Autoregressive Varying Coefficient Models with Application to Boston House Price Analysis

Specification Test for Spatial Autoregressive Models

When Space Matters: Spatial Dependence, Diagnostics, and Regression Models

A RMT-based LM Test for Error Cross-Sectional Independence in Large Heterogeneous Panel Data Models*