Abstract:There has been an increasing interest recently in the analysis of financial data that arrives at irregular intervals. An important class of models is the autoregressive Conditional Duration (ACD) model introduced by Engle and Russell (Econometrica 66:1127-1162, 1998, [22]) and its various generalizations. These models have been used to describe duration clustering for financial data such as the arrival times of trades and price changes. However, relatively few evaluation procedures for the adequacy of ACD models are currently available in the literature. Given its simplicity, a commonly used diagnostic test is the Box-Pierce/Ljung-Box statistic adapted to the estimated standardized residuals of ACD models, but its asymptotic distribution is not the standard one due to parameter estimation uncertainty. In this paper we propose a test for duration clustering and a test for the adequacy of ACD models using wavelet methods. The first test exploits the one-sided nature of duration clustering. An ACD process is positively autocorrelated at all lags, resulting in a spectral mode at frequency zero. In particular, it has a spectral peak at zero when duration clustering is persistent or when duration clustering is small at each individual lag but carries over a long distributional lag. As a joint time-frequency decomposition method, wavelets can effectively capture spectral peaks and thus are expected to be powerful. Our second test checks the adequacy of an ACD model by using a wavelet-based spectral density of the estimated standardized residuals over the whole frequency. Unlike the Box-Pierce/Ljung-Box tests, the proposed diagnostic test has a convenient asymptotic "nuisance parameter-free" property-parameter estimation uncertainty has no impact on the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic. Moreover, it can check a wide range of alternatives and is powerful when the spectrum of the standardized duration residuals is nonsmooth, as can arise from neglected persistent duration clustering, seasonality, calender effects and business cycles. For each of the two new tests, we propose and justify a suitable data-driven method to choose the finest scale-the smoothing parameter in wavelet estimation. This makes the methods fully operational in practice. We present a simulation study, illustrating the merits of the wavelet-based procedures. An application with tick-by-tick trading data of Alcoa stock is presented.

A New Test for ARCH Effects and Its Finite-Sample Performance

One‐sided Testing for Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Time Series Models

Testing ARCH effect of high-dimensional time series data

ONE-SIDED TESTING FOR ARCH EFFECTS USING WAVELETS

Diagnostic Checking for the Adequacy of Nonlinear Time Series Models

Consistent Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form

A Note on Self-Normalized Dickey-Fuller Test for Unit Root in Autoregressive Time Series with GARCH Errors

Diagnostic Checking Integer-Valued ARCH(p) Models Using Conditional Residual Autocorrelations

On Diagnostic Checking Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models with Wavelet-Based Spectral Density Estimators

On an asymmetric functional-coefficient ARCH-M model

Testing second order dynamics for autoregressive processes in presence of time-varying variance

Wavelet-Based Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form in Panel Models

Detecting Misspecifications in Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models

Testing the Structure of Conditional Correlations in Multivariate Garch Models: A Generalized Cross-Spectrum Approach

A Score Statistic for Testing the Presence of a Stochastic Trend in Conditional Variances

On A Robust Test for Setar-Type Nonlinearity in Time Series Analysis

On a Threshold Double Autoregressive Model

Revised BDS Test

Test for Autocorrelation Change in Discretely Observed Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes Driven by Lévy Processes

Towards a unified test for the intercept of autoregressive models

Locally Most Powerful Test for the Random Coefficient Autoregressive Model