Abstract:The class of doubly robust (DR) functionals studied by Rotnitzky et al. (2021) is of central importance in economics and biostatistics. It strictly includes both (i) the class of mean-square continuous functionals that can be written as an expectation of an affine functional of a conditional expectation studied by Chernozhukov et al. (2022b) and the class of functionals studied by Robins et al. (2008). The present state-of-the-art estimators for DR functionals ψ are double-machine-learning (DML) estimators (Chernozhukov et al., 2018a). A DML estimator ψ̂1 of ψ depends on estimates p̂(x) and b̂(x) of a pair of nuisance functions p(x) and b(x) , and is said to satisfy "rate double-robustness" if the Cauchy–Schwarz upper bound of its bias is o(n−1/2) . Rate double-robustness implies that the bias is o(n−1/2) , but the converse is false. Were it achievable, our scientific goal would have been to construct valid, assumption-lean (i.e. no complexity-reducing assumptions on b or p ) tests of the validity of a nominal (1−α) Wald confidence interval (CI) centered at ψ̂1 . But this would require a test of the bias to be o(n−1/2) , which can be shown not to exist. We therefore adopt the less ambitious goal of falsifying, when possible, an analyst's justification for her claim that the reported (1−α) Wald CI is valid. In many instances, an analyst justifies her claim by imposing complexity-reducing assumptions on b and p to ensure "rate double-robustness". Here we exhibit valid, assumption-lean tests of H0 : "rate double-robustness holds", with non-trivial power against certain alternatives. If H0 is rejected, we will have falsified her justification. However, no assumption-lean test of H0 , including ours, can be a consistent test. Thus, the failure of our test to reject is not meaningful evidence in favor of H0 .

Double-Length Regression Tests for Testing Functional Forms and Spatial Error Dependence

Nonlinearity and Spatial Lag Dependence: Tests Based on Double-Length Regressions

DOUBLE LENGTH ARTIFICIAL REGRESSIONS FOR TESTING SPATIAL DEPENDENCE

The Quadratic Inference Functions in Measurement Error Model for Longitudinal Data

Double-length Regressions for the Box–Cox Difference Model with Heteroskedasticity or Autocorrelation

CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION BASED TESTING FOR CONDITIONAL INDEPENDENCE: A NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION APPROACH

Research on the Validity of Bootstrap LM-Error Test in Spatial Random Effect Models

Statistical Tests under Dallal's Model: Asymptotic and Exact Methods.

A Loss Function Approach to Model Specification Testing and Its Relative Efficiency

Statistical tests under Dallal’s model: Asymptotic and exact methods

Identity Tests for High Dimensional Data Using Rmt

Characteristic Function-Based Testing for Multifactor Continuous-Time Markov Models Via Nonparametric Regression

Testing linearity in semi-functional partially linear regression models

Test of Weak Separability for Spatially Stationary Functional Field

Lack of Fit Test for Long Memory Regression Models

K-depth tests for testing simultaneously independence and other model assumptions in time series

Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators

Model Checking in Partially Linear Spatial Autoregressive Models

Double Robust high dimensional alpha test for linear factor pricing model

Testing for error correlation in partially functional linear regression models

Weighted residual empirical processes, martingale transformations and model checking for regressions