Abstract:There has been an increasing interest recently in the analysis of financial data that arrives at irregular intervals. An important class of models is the autoregressive Conditional Duration (ACD) model introduced by Engle and Russell (Econometrica 66:1127-1162, 1998, [22]) and its various generalizations. These models have been used to describe duration clustering for financial data such as the arrival times of trades and price changes. However, relatively few evaluation procedures for the adequacy of ACD models are currently available in the literature. Given its simplicity, a commonly used diagnostic test is the Box-Pierce/Ljung-Box statistic adapted to the estimated standardized residuals of ACD models, but its asymptotic distribution is not the standard one due to parameter estimation uncertainty. In this paper we propose a test for duration clustering and a test for the adequacy of ACD models using wavelet methods. The first test exploits the one-sided nature of duration clustering. An ACD process is positively autocorrelated at all lags, resulting in a spectral mode at frequency zero. In particular, it has a spectral peak at zero when duration clustering is persistent or when duration clustering is small at each individual lag but carries over a long distributional lag. As a joint time-frequency decomposition method, wavelets can effectively capture spectral peaks and thus are expected to be powerful. Our second test checks the adequacy of an ACD model by using a wavelet-based spectral density of the estimated standardized residuals over the whole frequency. Unlike the Box-Pierce/Ljung-Box tests, the proposed diagnostic test has a convenient asymptotic "nuisance parameter-free" property-parameter estimation uncertainty has no impact on the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic. Moreover, it can check a wide range of alternatives and is powerful when the spectrum of the standardized duration residuals is nonsmooth, as can arise from neglected persistent duration clustering, seasonality, calender effects and business cycles. For each of the two new tests, we propose and justify a suitable data-driven method to choose the finest scale-the smoothing parameter in wavelet estimation. This makes the methods fully operational in practice. We present a simulation study, illustrating the merits of the wavelet-based procedures. An application with tick-by-tick trading data of Alcoa stock is presented.

K-depth tests for testing simultaneously independence and other model assumptions in time series

Diagnostic Checking for the Adequacy of Nonlinear Time Series Models

Kernel-based joint independence tests for multivariate stationary and non-stationary time series

CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION BASED TESTING FOR CONDITIONAL INDEPENDENCE: A NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION APPROACH

Approach to Testing Nonlinear Time Series Models

Specification Tests for Time-Varying Coefficient Models

Kernel-based Tests for Joint Independence

Consistent Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form

Detecting Neglected Nonlinearity in Dynamic Panel Data with Time-Varying Conditional Heteroskedasticity

A General Approach to Testing Volatility Models in Time Series

Sequential Kernelized Independence Testing

Testing Strict Stationarity With Applications To Macroeconomic Time Series

Wavelet-Based Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form in Panel Models

On Diagnostic Checking Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models with Wavelet-Based Spectral Density Estimators

Testing for Pairwise Serial Independence Via the Empirical Distribution Function

Independence Testing for Temporal Data

Test for independence of long-range dependent time series using distance covariance

Testing for Independence Between Two Stationary Time Series Via the Empirical Characteristic Function

Testing for Smooth Structural Changes in Time Series Models via Nonparametric Regression

Kernel-based independence tests for causal structure learning on functional data

Multivariate two-sample test statistics based on data depth