Validation of the Thought-Action Fusion Scale among Chinese college students
QIAN Ming-Yi,GAO Jun,XIAO Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.11.015
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Shafran et al.' s(1996)Thought-Action Fusion Scale(TAFS).Methods:In order to examine the validity of the TAFS,a convenience sample of 378 college students completed the Beck Depression Inventory,State-Trait Anxiety Inventory,Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale,a measure of Chinese superstition and the TAFS.In order to test the cross-cultural validity of the cognitive model of obsessions,a second sample of 273 students completed the White Bear Suppression Inventory,Padua Inventory,and the TAFS.Results:CFA results provided support for a 3-factor model(χ2/df = 2.25,CFI = 0.92,TLI = 0.90,RMSEA = 0.07,SRMR = 0.06).Internal consistency and test-retest coefficients for the TAFS-total were 0.86 and 0.67,respectively.Criterion-related validity results could be summarized as follows.TAFS-total scores and TAF-Likelihood scores showed positive significant correlations with scores of depression(r=0.19,0.27),perfectionism(r=0.25,0.27),and superstition(r=0.25,0.26).TAF-Likelihood scores also showed a positive significant correlation with anxiety scores(r=0.22),and TAF-Morality scores revealed very low correlation coefficients with the constructs mentioned above.Furthermore,SEM results confirmed a model wherein thought suppression mediates the relationship between TAF and obsessive-compulsive symptoms(χ2/df = 1.29,CFI = 0.99,GFI = 0.99,TFL = 0.98,RMSEA = 0.04).Conclusion:The present findings provide support for the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the TAFS.Theoretical,clinical and cross-cultural implications are discussed.Limitations and directions for future research are identified as well.