Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

A study on regeneration of the bone defects due to peri-implantitis

[Short-Term Outcome of Regenerative Surgery Treating Peri-Implantitis].

An Experimental Study on the Restorative Effect of Coralline Hydroxyapatite versus Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Filled the Bone Defects around Implants

Guided Tissue Regeneration of Deep Intrabony Defects in Strategically Important Prosthetic Abutments

Different bone grafts with guided bone regeneration for treatment of bone defects around implants

Reosseointegration Following Regenerative Therapy of Tissue-Engineered Bone in A Canine Model of Experimental Peri-Implantitis

Guided bone regeneration for peri‐implant augmentation: A retrospective study comparing two surgical techniques with a mean follow‐up of 26 months

Experiment of GBR for Repair of Peri-Implant Alveolar Defects in Beagle Dogs.

Efficacy of positive space acquiring membrane and antimicrobial membrane combined with granular bone substitute implantation in guiding oral bone regeneration

Guided Bone Regeneration Using Collagen Scaffolds, Growth Factors, and Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells for Treatment of Peri-Implant Bone Defects In Vivo

Bone tissue regeneration in peri-implantitis: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

[Using Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) to Improve Bone Regeneration in Implant Bone Defect].

Advantages of long-term stability of guided bone regeneration compared with autogenous bone grafting

Esthetic Outcome of Guided Bone Regeneration with Titanium Membrane in Single Anterior Maxillary Implant Site

Combination of Bone Morphogenetic Protein with Technique of Guide Tissue Regeneration in the Repair of Periodontal Bone Defects

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

Guided bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement using membrane in combination with titanium mesh for repair of alveolar defects in Beagle dogs

[Preclinical Study of the Effects of Fluorinated Porcine Hydroxyapatite in Repairing Peri-Implant Bone Defects in Canine Mandible].

Peri‐Implant Bone Regeneration Using Rhpdgf‐bb, BMSCs, and Β‐tcp in a Canine Model

Tissue Regeneration of Chronic Periodontal Defects Using Tissue Engineering Approaches in a Dog Model

Data Mining-Based Clinical Study on the Effect of Oral Restoration Film in Guiding Oral Bone Regeneration and Dental Implantation