Abstract:Background: Recent researches have demonstrated that, the bone grafts with guided bone regeneration technique are an important method of clinical repairing of peri-implant bone defects. Objective: To evaluate the bone formation of different bone grafts combined with guided bone regeneration for the repairing of peri-implant bone defects. Design, time and setting: A controlled observation was performed in the Central Laboratory and Animal Experimental Center of Dalian Medical University (Dalian, Liaoning, China) between May 2004 and March 2005. Materials: Four male healthy mongrel dogs, weighing 11-15 kg; Bio-oss bone dust was purchased from USA; Titanium screw and titanium membrane were offered by Xi'an Zhongbang Biomaterials Co., Ltd (China). Methods: After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium screws was performed on each side of the mandible of four mongrel dogs. Three-wall bone defects at a size of 3 mm high, 3 mm wide and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. All mandibles were divided into four groups: The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone, and the mixture of both bones. Control group was not subject to the implantation. The surgical areas of the left mandible were covered with titanium membranes, whereas the right mandible without membrane was used as controls. Main outcome measures: The microstructure of bone defects area, the mass and structure of newly formed bone, as well as the degradation of Bio-oss bone dust were detected under light microscopy. Results: All 4 dogs were involved in the result analysis. No titanium membrane exposed at 9 weeks postoperatively. Other two dogs appeared the exposure and shedding of titanium membrane at 10 and 12 weeks, respectively. They were healed by debridements. All 32 titanium screws binded with the bone well, without any loosening or drop. Pseudomembrane formed on the surface of bone defects area, where the titanium membrane dropped. The mass of bone resorption was the most highest in the control group compared to other groups (P < 0.01); The mass in the mixture group was obviously lower than that in autograft group (P < 0.05). Both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture graft specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens. Whether the membranes were utilized or not, the mass of bone resorption was larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings (P < 0.01). Conclusion: It is feasible to repair the peri-implant bone defects using autologous bone in combination with Bio-oss mineral bone. The mixture may significantly promote the bone regenerating, and titanium membrane promotes the absorption of bone graft.

Esthetic Outcome of Guided Bone Regeneration with Titanium Membrane in Single Anterior Maxillary Implant Site

Clinical Observation of Titanium Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration in Single Maxillary Implant Site

Facial alveolar bone alterations and gray value changes based on cone beam computed tomography around maxillary anterior implants: A clinical retrospective study of 1-3 years

Clinical Study of Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-implant Bone Defects with Combining Titanium Membrane and Collagen Membrane

Clinical outcome of titanium membranes for the guided bone regeneration in dental implantation with immediate prosthesis

Evaluation of Hard Tissue 3-Dimensional Stability Around Single Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration in the Anterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

[Clinical study of titanium mesh in conjunction with concentrate growth factors to rebuild severe bone defect of anterior maxilla]

Hard tissue stability after guided bone regeneration: a comparison between digital titanium mesh and resorbable membrane

Profilometric, esthetic, and patient‐reported outcomes of the L‐shape technique combined with delayed connective tissue grafting in the maxillary anterior region: A 3‐year case series study

Clinical observation of bioabsorbable membrane used in dental implantation

Hard Tissue Volume Stability of Guided Bone Regeneration During the Healing Stage in the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Study

Clinical and Micro-CT analyses of Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration of Mandible using a d-PTFE Membrane, Autogenous Bone, and High-Temperature Processed Xenograft- A Case Series Study

Histological Study on the Polyhydroxybutyric Ester(PHB) Membrane Used for Guided Bone Regeneration Around Titanium Dental Implants

Alveolar Bone Morphologic Predictors for Guided Bone Regeneration Outcome in Anterior Maxilla.

Clinical Application of Double Layers Membrane Technique in Repairing Bone Defect of Maxillary Anterior with Delayded Implantation

Horizontal Bone Augmentation in the Anterior Esthetic Area of the Maxilla Using a Flap Design Adapted from Mucogingival Surgery in Association with PLA Membrane and β-TCP

Guided Tissue Regeneration of Deep Intrabony Defects in Strategically Important Prosthetic Abutments

Different bone grafts with guided bone regeneration for treatment of bone defects around implants

Guided bone regeneration for peri‐implant augmentation: A retrospective study comparing two surgical techniques with a mean follow‐up of 26 months

Experiment of GBR for Repair of Peri-Implant Alveolar Defects in Beagle Dogs.

Implants sites with concomitant bone regeneration using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane result in stable marginal bone levels and similar profilometric outcomes over 5 years