An Experimental Study on the Restorative Effect of Coralline Hydroxyapatite versus Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Filled the Bone Defects around Implants

L(U) Xiaofei,PENG Cheng,LAI Hongchang,CUI Jiangtao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2012.10.019
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the restorative effect of coralline hydroxyapatite (CHA) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) on the defect healing around implants. Methods: All mandibular premolars and 1st molars were extracted bilaterally in six Beagle dogs. After three months of healing, four experimental canals were prepared on each side of the mandible. The margin of the canal was further drilled to create the 1-1.25 mm circumferential and 5 mm deep bone defect around the coronal portion. Then, four implants were inserted in extraction sites on each side. The standardized bone defects were filled with blood clot, CHA or β-TCP,respectively. All implants were non-submerged. Two dogs were sacrificed at 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks following implant placement, and the specimens were prepared and stained with trinitrophenol fuchsin for histological and histomorphometric analyses to acquire the data about the distance between the most coronal level of bone-to-implant contact and the bottom of the surgically created bone defect (B-D), and the data about the bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) within the defect area. Values for newly formed bone area percentage (NFB %) and remaining bone substitutes percentage (RBS%) were additionally calculated for all biomaterial-grafted samples utilizing the Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. Results: No implant was loose or lost after installation. The peri-implant soft tissue was indicated no inflammation. There were no significant differences in B-D and BIC% 4 weeks and 12 weeks after implantation between three treatment groups (P > 0.05). The values of B-D and BIC% were significantly higher in β-TCP group than those of CHA group at 16 weeks (P < 0.01). The value of RBS% was significantly higher in CHA group than that of β-TCP group at week 12 and16 (P < 0.01). The value of NFB% was significantly higher in β-TCP group than that of CHA group at week16 (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The bone regeneration within defects surrounding the implant could be accelerated by using β-TCP than that of CHA, which suggested that the application of β-TCP was one more predictable treatment with respect to restoring bone defects around implants.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?