Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

Peri‐Implant Bone Regeneration Using Rhpdgf‐bb, BMSCs, and Β‐tcp in a Canine Model

Bone Formation at Porous Titanium Implants Coated with Multiple Layers of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Cdna Plasmid in the Posterior Mandible in Dogs.

Reosseointegration Following Regenerative Therapy of Tissue-Engineered Bone in A Canine Model of Experimental Peri-Implantitis

The bone-forming effects of HIF-1α-transduced BMSCs promote osseointegration with dental implant in canine mandible

Cooperative Effects of PRF and BMSCs in Alveolar Bone Regeneration in a Canine Model

Comparison of Intraoral Bone Regeneration with Iliac and Alveolar BMSCs

Repair of canine mandibular bone defects with bone marrow stromal cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate

Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate and Autologous Osteoblasts in Canine Mandible

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

[Preclinical Study of the Effects of Fluorinated Porcine Hydroxyapatite in Repairing Peri-Implant Bone Defects in Canine Mandible].

The Healing of Critical-Size Calvarial Bone Defects in Rat with Rhpdgf-Bb, BMSCs, and Β-Tcp Scaffolds.

Periodontal regeneration using bone morphogenetic protein 2 incorporated biomimetic calcium phosphate in conjunction with barrier membrane: A pre‐clinical study in dogs

Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa As a Barrier Membrane: an Experimental Study in Dogs

Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Alveolar Cleft Repaired with a Tissue Engineering Bone: an Experimental Study in Dogs.

Research of Repairing Canine Segmental Mandibular Bone Defects by Using Implant Combining with Bone Tissue Engineering

Repair of Bone Defects Around Dental Implants with Bone Morphogenetic Protein/fibroblast Growth Factor-Loaded Porous Calcium Phosphate Cement: a Pilot Study in a Canine Model

Reconstruction of Mandibular Bone Defects Using Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes with Simultaneous Implant Placement in Mini-Swine: A Pilot in Vivo Study.

Periodontal Wound Healing by Transplantation of Jaw Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chitosan/Anorganic Bovine Bone Carrier into One-Wall Infrabony Defects in Beagles.

Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells Transplanted with Nanohydroxyapatite/Chitosan/Gelatin 3D Porous Scaffolds Promote Jaw Bone Regeneration in Swine

Peri-implant tissue augmentation by volume-stable collagen matrix transplantation: a study of dog mandibles

Experimental Study on Reconstruction of Segmental Mandible Defects Using Tissue Engineered Bone Combined Bone Marrow Stromal Cells with Three-Dimensional Tricalcium Phosphate