Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Chinese Absolutism: From the Perspective of the Typology of Political Regimes

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

The Vertically Decentralized Authoritarianism and the Mechanisms of Political Stability in China

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Nation and Governance——Government Monopoly on the Market in China's History and Its Political Cause

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

On Absolutism(The Middle Part)——The Origin of Autocracy

On Absolutism(Final)——Autarchy and the Value of Absolutism

On the Paternal-State System

On the Types of Countries:Based on the Regime

The Totalitarian Model Revisited

From Limited Royalty to Unlimited Royalty:The Political Course of the Birth of China

Heaven,Kingship and the Royal Power: Fundamental Structure of Kingship Politics and its Function to Rectify Civilization

A General Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Politics

Loyalty versus Competence : Internal Conflicts and the Pattern of Bureaucratic Control in China , 1644-1911

Is Monarch a Good Thing? A Critique of "Confucian Constitutionalism"

Axiological Rules And Chinese Political Philosophy

The Era of Prefectures and Counties: An Inquiry into the Power Structure and State Governance in Ancient Chinese Society

Heaven: the Possibility and Basis of Being a Monarch--Dong Zhongshu's Philosophical Interpretations of Being a Monarch

From Political Decay to Totalism: The Evolution of "Centralization-Decentralization" Mode in Modern China