Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with normal versus impaired renal function

LI Shou-bin,ZHAO Qing,CUI Shi-fang,LI Shuang-li,ZHANG Xiao-wei,YANG Bo,LI Jian-xing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2013.05.020
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the postoperative outcomes and complications of patients with normal renal function and renal insufficiency who received percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods Data of 92 patients with renal insufficiency who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomies during Dec.2005 to Dec.2012 were retrospectively analyzed,and 92 patients with normal renal function who received percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the same period were chosen as controls.The average operation time,hospitalization days,surgical complications were statistically analyzed.Results The mean operation time,average hospitalization days and severe bleeding incidence(needs blood transfusion or interventional treatment)was(101.89±46.75)minutes,(21.79±9.71)days and 22.9%in renal insufficiency group,significantly higher than those of the control group,which were(84.12±44.50)minutes,(15.96±6.57)days and 2.2%(P<0.005).The stone clearance rate was56%in the renal insufficiency group and80.4%in the control group,with significant difference(P<0.005),which might be explained that renal insufficiency caused greater stone burden and possible damage on blood coagulation.Conclusions The operation risk is higher in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.Therefore,percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency should be performed by experienced doctors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?