Abstract:To many readers' surprise,Epicurus and his materialist disciples claimed that they believe in gods.Is it to be explained by insincere compromise? As we know,Leo Strauss teaches people that because of the fear of persecution,philosophers often distinguish their writings into two types,one of which is "exoteric," and the other is esoteric.When philosophers talk to the public,they are wont to speak in the fashion of the public,which means to follow the custom of national piety.However,when they talk in the inner circle,they will reveal their true believes which acknowledge no limit of critical reflection.If this is a useful guide,we may find that Epicurus is not an atheist,because in his epistle to his disciple he emphatically affirmed that gods exist,since this knowledge is clear and explicit.The reason Epicurus believe in this knowledge is that we do have the images(shadows) from gods in the dreams.One may doubt that images in dreams could be the solid basis of such serious issues.However,according to Epicurus' Canonic,all senses are real,and this is because they are images flowing from the real objects.Of course there will be further doubts that some images may be pure fantasy.Here comes in the second canon of Epicurean philosophy,namely,preconception.Because preconceptions are always clear and explicit,universally held by all peoples,they are also canon of Truth.What are preconceptions of gods? There are at least two main conceptions,one of which is "perfection," and the other is "the First cause." However,the two concepts of gods are not always in harmony.Epicurus thinks that the former preconception is more fundamental,and any deviation from this understanding is inconsistency.A busy god who engages in human affairs consists of such inconsistency.Gods must be isolated individuals without any care and bothering for others,and so suffers no sudden joy and dismays.But most Greeks tend to embrace the latter preconception and expect constants help from divinity.The two understandings have different implications for political life.The gods of the populace mainly provide sentimentality of authority and security,while Epicurus' gods are meant to enlighten people with the freedom that will truly help them to live an autonomic co-existence.

On the Reciprocity of the King and the Gods in Ancient Egypt

The Ancient Egyptians' Concepts of Foreigners

Egypt’s Old Kingdom

The concept of religious authority and power of the monarch in Shang Dynasty

Study On Exchange Relationship Between Government And Non-Governmental Organization

The Influence of the Ancient Egyptians'Concept of Afterlife Reflected in the Form and Structure of Their Tombs

Egyptian Scholars, Priests and Temples between Autonomy and State Authority

From Expectation to Desperation --On the Origin and Development of the Idea of Afterlife in Ancient Egypt

An Analysis of the Ideology of Ghosts and Gods' Rewards and Penalties in the Song Dynasty

On the Relationship between Gods and Human Being in Greek and Chinese Mythology

Egypt and Egyptology in the Course of Expansion and Competition of the European Powers

The Early Stage of the Formation of Ancient Egypt

Origins of Ancient Egyptian Civilization: Endogenous and Hybridized Views

The functions of ancient Egyptian obelisks (according to the inscriptions on the 18th and 19th dynasties monuments)

Epicurus On Gods

TERMS REFERRING TO DISTANCING IN ANCIENT EGYPTIAN RELIGIOUS TEXTS

On the Paternal-State System

Divinity and Humanity——On the Differences between Chinese and Greek Mythologies

Social Discourses in Egypt: Historical Developments of Interfaith Relations between Christians and Muslims

A Comparative Analysis of the high deity “Shangdi” (上帝) in Chinese Pre-Qin Literature and "God" in the Bible

STUDY ON THE RITUAL ARCHITECTURE OF LUOYANG CITY IN HAN AND WEI DYNASTIES