Abstract:Cicero represents the efforts by the Roman philosophers who tried to create their own philosophy by means of re-reading Greek philosophy. The new Roman philosophy exhibits its own originality which differs from the Greek one and is more akin to modern philosophical thinking. Thus more attention should be directed to this much-neglected style of wisdom.In Hellenistic-Roman philosophies, one interesting phenomenon can be observed: many have passed over Plato and Aristotle and traced back to Socrates in order to re-find the ″orthodoxy″ of philosophy. Stoics did that, and so did the Academics. Cicero played his role in this line of Socratic-orthodoxy discovery. When Cicero claimed that Socrates was the first man who turned philosophy from heaven to the city, he was not just describing some ordinary ″philosophical turn″, rather, he was pointing out the real nature of philosophy: to be the reflection on politics and the moral good.The philosophy school that followed this orthodoxy, as Cicero believed, was the Academic philosophers who pursued ″probable truth″ rather than absolute truth.The former was attained through dialectic examination of opinions and thus belonged eventually in the domain of opinion, sufficient, however, to guide life, while the latter was not attainable and useless to life.Probable truth is the truth that has reasonable apology or justification. This wording reminds people of a forensic rhetoric. Actually, rhetoric politics is another part of the new feature of Roman philosophy founded by Cicero. Rhetoric aims at persuasion.Greek philosophers like Socrates and Plato criticized rhetoric art fiercely because it did not resort to truth. Plato did have his own art of speaking, namely dialectics. But Cicero emphasized more on the public speech in the court and the senate, for it brought benefits for the commonwealth. Roman republican philosophers believed that philosophy must serve the real reforms in political life, rather than the mere theoretical perfection.The change of focus on probable truth and public rhetoric entails other profound changes in the philosophical thinking. For instance, Cicero re-ordered the Telos in favor of the life-form of practical statesmen, rather than that of speculative philosophers. Meanwhile, he stressed more on the internal relation between natural law and custom, avoiding the idealistic orientation in the justification of moral norms.Cicero’s contribution is significant, for since then both Greek idealistic philosophy and Roman rhetoric philosophy have constituted distinct and coexistent sub-traditions within the Western tradition of political philosophy.

Epicurus On Gods

Divinity and Humanity——On the Differences between Chinese and Greek Mythologies

Epicurus and Enlightenment Literature:Lucretius's Laudation of Epicurus in De Rerum Natura

Worship Beauty as One Would Worship God: An Interpretation of Plato's Phaedrus

Basic Concept of Gods in Buddhism

Cicero on Socrates

The Utopia of Eros: On Aristophanes' Encomium in Plato's <i>Symposium</i>

Discussion on the Ideas of the Two Gods by Paulos Huang, Guanghu He and Peng Yang

Seneca and Epicurus

Egoism in Philosophical Argument

On Spinoza's Thinking of“Substance”and “the Existence of Purposiveness of Individual”

On the Relationship between Gods and Human Being in Greek and Chinese Mythology

The Basic Principle of Cognitive Therapy in the Fragment of Epicurus

Divinity and Humanity The Analysis of Gods'Image and Personality in Chinese and Greek Mythologies

Concept of "Kindness" and Truthful Life——Shestov on Socrates

The various schools of thoughts of gods and spirits in the pre- Qin times: a survey

An Ideal Religion for an Ideal State

“Justice is Happiness”?—an Analysis of Plato’s Strategies in Response to Challenges from the Sophists

How Life with Belief could Be

Doubts about Empiricism

Had Plato Successfully Proved That Justice is Happiness