Abstract:To many readers' surprise,Epicurus and his materialist disciples claimed that they believe in gods.Is it to be explained by insincere compromise? As we know,Leo Strauss teaches people that because of the fear of persecution,philosophers often distinguish their writings into two types,one of which is "exoteric," and the other is esoteric.When philosophers talk to the public,they are wont to speak in the fashion of the public,which means to follow the custom of national piety.However,when they talk in the inner circle,they will reveal their true believes which acknowledge no limit of critical reflection.If this is a useful guide,we may find that Epicurus is not an atheist,because in his epistle to his disciple he emphatically affirmed that gods exist,since this knowledge is clear and explicit.The reason Epicurus believe in this knowledge is that we do have the images(shadows) from gods in the dreams.One may doubt that images in dreams could be the solid basis of such serious issues.However,according to Epicurus' Canonic,all senses are real,and this is because they are images flowing from the real objects.Of course there will be further doubts that some images may be pure fantasy.Here comes in the second canon of Epicurean philosophy,namely,preconception.Because preconceptions are always clear and explicit,universally held by all peoples,they are also canon of Truth.What are preconceptions of gods? There are at least two main conceptions,one of which is "perfection," and the other is "the First cause." However,the two concepts of gods are not always in harmony.Epicurus thinks that the former preconception is more fundamental,and any deviation from this understanding is inconsistency.A busy god who engages in human affairs consists of such inconsistency.Gods must be isolated individuals without any care and bothering for others,and so suffers no sudden joy and dismays.But most Greeks tend to embrace the latter preconception and expect constants help from divinity.The two understandings have different implications for political life.The gods of the populace mainly provide sentimentality of authority and security,while Epicurus' gods are meant to enlighten people with the freedom that will truly help them to live an autonomic co-existence.

Is Epicurus the father of Reinforcement Learning?

Epicurus On Gods

Reward is not enough: can we liberate AI from the reinforcement learning paradigm?

A General Perspective on Objectives of Reinforcement Learning

Three Dogmas of Reinforcement Learning

Axioms for AI Alignment from Human Feedback

Causal Campbell-Goodhart's law and Reinforcement Learning

Parenting: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Input

Opinion-Guided Reinforcement Learning

Moral reinforcement learning using actual causation

Reinforcement Learning in Economics and Finance

Human-Level Reinforcement Learning through Theory-Based Modeling, Exploration, and Planning

Do Artificial Reinforcement-Learning Agents Matter Morally?

Toward a Psychology of Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents Using a Cognitive Architecture

Reinforcement Learning and its Connections with Neuroscience and Psychology

Rationality based Innate-Values-driven Reinforcement Learning

The History and Risks of Reinforcement Learning and Human Feedback

Feature Control as Intrinsic Motivation for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

A Brandom-ian view of Reinforcement Learning towards strong-AI

A Definition of Happiness for Reinforcement Learning Agents

Simplifying social learning