Moral Ateisme-Humanisme Paul Kurtz vs Divine Commandments

Ceme Vinsensius Coba
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/snf.v1i1.8362
2023-03-01
Abstract:This article examines Paul Kurtz's thoughts on morality in the context of atheistic humanism, which asserts that humans can uphold goodness and moral values without reference to God. Kurtz argues that morality can stem from human rationality and experience. This article aims to critique this view by showing that without God, the motivation to act morally becomes less convincing for many people. Furthermore, this article will compare Kurtz's views with Divine Command Theory, which states that the existence of God provides an objective and stable foundation for morality. Therefore, while some individuals may live morally without belief in God, this article argues that the existence of God is a stronger and epistemologically secure foundation for moral values. Through this analysis, the author directs the purpose of the article towards exploring the depth and limitations of atheistic humanism morality compared to the theistic perspective on the source of morality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?