Stefanos Geroulanos, 'an Atheism That is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought'

Tom Rockmore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fh/crs078
IF: 0.114
2012-01-01
French History
Abstract:An Atheism That is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought. By Stefanos Geroulanos. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2010. xi + 423 pp. ISBN: 978 0 8047 6298 4. Stefanos Geroulanos’ study is inspired by an insight of Emmanuel Levinas’ about a so-called ‘atheism that is not humanism,’ more precisely ‘the exaltation of an obedience and a faithfulness that are not obedience or faithfulness to anyone’. Following this suggestion, Geroulanos contends ‘From World War I through the 1950s, a philosophical and intellectual revolution in France created a new kind of atheism, demolished the value of humanism, and altered the meaning of ‘the human virtually beyond recognition’. He thinks this is the result of a conceptual reorganisation that mainly occurred from 1925 until 1950, and that a decade later had acquired the name of ‘antihumanism’ as almost the official face of French thought. This is an antihumanist perspective for which, unlike, say Feuerbach, who jettisons God to hold on to man, there is neither God nor man. In Geroulanos’ reading of the evolution of recent French thought, the supposed shift away from so-called classical atheism and humanism runs along three interrelated tracks. There is, first, what he detects as the rise during the 1930s and 1940s of an atheism that is not humanist since it is mistrustful of so-called secular, egalitarian and transformative commitments. Next there is the emergence of a negative philosophical anthropology, which turns away from the possibility of defining what is strictly human. And finally there is the rise of a critique of humanism after the First World War.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?