The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)

郝世胜,王惠玲,张静静,刘璇,刘忠纯,王高华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7201.2009.03.004
2009-01-01
Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract:Objective To test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of BACS.Methods A total of 56 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis were recruited and evaluated using BACS(Chinese version).The principle component analysis and reliability analysis were conducted. Results ①Factor analysis showed that KMO value was 0.820,and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity,χ2=102.430,P0.01. The principle component analysis suggested that there were three factors for BACS. ②The Pearson correlation coefficients between the 6 subtests ranged from 0.126~0.554. Except the correlation coefficient between London Tower and semantic fluency subtest,there was significant correlation among the other subtests. ③The internal consistency reliability was 0.810 (Cronbach α Based on Standardized Items). ④The subtests of the A and B versions were significantly correlated,and the coefficients ranged from 0.736~0.968.Conclusion The validity and reliability of BACS (Chinese version) are acceptable. Therefore BACS is a useful tool for assessing the cognition function in schizophrenia patients in Chinese regions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?