Validity and Reliability of Chinese Version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale

王华丽,舒良,司天梅,田成华,张鸿燕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2000.02.007

2000-01-01

Abstract:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS). Methods: According to the criteria of NINCDS ADRDA, 20 patients diagnosed as probable cases of Alzheimer's disease, were studied. Two raters, informed of the diagnosis and blind to each other, were asked to score the ADAS, MMSE, ADL and the Blessed Roth Rating Scale (BRRS) independently. Correlational analysis was applied for examining reliability and internal consistency. Results: For all items, the values of kappa for inter-rater reliability were above 0.75 (p0.05). The scores of the items in the ADAS-Cog were correlated with each other significantly (p0.01), whereas no significant correlation was found between most of the items in the ADAS-NCog. There were significant differences of the total scores of ADAS-Cog, ADAS-NCog and ADAS between subgroups with different ratings of GDS. The total score of the ADAS-Cog was negatively correlated with that of MMSE (r=0.803,p0.01), and positively correlated with that of ADL and BRS (r=0.463,p0.05 and r=0.458, p0.05,respectively). The total score of ADAS was negatively correlated with that of MMSE (r=0.778, p0.01), and positively correlated with that of BRS(r=0.448, p0.01). Conclusion: ADAS was useful as a clinical instrument to evaluate the severity of Alzheimer's disease.