Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Part

李霞,肖泽萍,肖世富,朱敏捷,沈莉莉,王涛,钱时兴,陈超
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive part (ADAS-Cog). Methods: 135 subjects with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and 78 normal control subjects were assessed by ADAS-Cog. 95 subjects with AD were retested after 4 weeks. The test-retest reliability, parallel validity and criterion validity were examined. Results: Except the item of concentration, the other item scores of ADAS-Cog and its total score were significantly correlated to retest ones (P0.001), ADAS-Cog total was correlated to the scores of MMSE, ADL and NPI (P0.01). By the diagnostic criterion for AD from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the fourth version (DSM-IV), optimal cut-off points of ADAS-Cog was 15.5, with sensitivity 91.9% and specificity 89.5%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.95. Conclusion: With satisfactory reliability and validity, ADAS-Cog can be applied to clinical researches or longitudinal studies on AD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?