Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases

WANG Jian,ZHANG Zheng-feng,LI Chang-qing,ZHENG Wen-jie,HUANG Bo,ZHOU Yue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2012.01.005
2012-01-01
Journal of Spinal Surgery
Abstract:Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MiTLIF) as revision surgery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods From March 2006 to November 2010,103 patients with recurrent lumbar degenerative diseases after primary discectomy and decompression were treated with MiTLIF and followed up.There were 45 males and 58 females with an average age of 53.4 years.During MiTLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation,single level procedure was performed in 97 patients,and 2 level procedures were performed in 6 patients.The operative time,blood loss,X-ray exposure time and complications were recorded.Clinical outcomes were assessed by visual analog scale(VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index(ODI).Fusion rates were determined by CT scan reconstruction and dynamic lumbar radiography at the final follow-up.Results The average follow-up lasted 26.1 months(range from 12 to 49 months).The intraoperative and postoperative blood losses were(358±67) mL and(52±20) mL,respectively.The average radiation exposure time was(42±13) s.There was significant difference between VAS scores for low back pain before operation and at the final follow up(6.3±2.5 vs.0.7±0.3,t=2.43,P<0.05).So were the VAS scores for leg pain and the ODI(7.5±2.4 vs.0.6±0.2,t=2.57,P<0.05;41.5±5.3 vs.13.1±2.8,t=4.39,P<0.01).The fusion rate at the final follow-up was 95.2%(98/103).New nerve root injury occurred in 4 cases,superficial wound infection in 4 cases,transient leg numbness in 12 cases and dural tearing in 5 cases.Conclusion MiTLIF is a safe and effective procedure for recurrent lumbar degenerative diseases after primary discectomy and decompression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?