Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open TLIF in treating recurrent degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods Fifty-two patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar disorders were divided into two groups.Twenty-four (17 males,7 females with average age of 51.1 years) underwent MIS-TLIF surgery.Thirteen cases had the surgery at L4.5 and eleven at L5S1.The primary surgeries were discectomy in 6 cases,discectomy with laminoplasty in 4 cases,laminectomy in 5 patients,and laminectomy and decompression in 9 cases.The reasons of revision surgeries were recurrent of lumber disc herniation in 10 cases and recurrent of lumbar spinal canal stenosis in 14 cases.Twenty-eight patients (20 males,8 females with the mean age of 50.8 years) underwent open TLIF.Among them,one was at L2.3,2 at L3,4,17 at L4.5 and 8 at L5S1 level.The reasons of revision surgeries were misdiagnosis in 1 case (no symptom relief after surgery),recurrent of lumber disc herniation in 23 cases and recurrent of lumbar spinal canal stenosis in 4 case.The primary surgeries were discectomy in 18 cases,microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in 2 cases,discectomy with laminoplasty in 4 cases,and laminectomy and decompression in 4 cases.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score,the visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain were assessed during the postoperative follow-up.The lumbar interbody fusion rate and accuracy of pedicle screws were evaluated by CT scanning.Results The mean operative duration was not significantly different (P＞0.05) between two groups.The mean incision length,the average amount of blood loss,incision VAS at 1 and 3 days after the surgery were better in MIS-TLIF group than that in open TLIF group (P＜0.05).The seconds of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy were 80±9 in MIS-TLIF group and 10±2 in open TLIF group (P＜0.05).No neurological deficit was observed in both groups.Two cases had dura tear,two occurred surgical site infection in open TLIF group.There was no significant difference in the accuracy rates of pedicle screws between MIS-TLIF group (93.8％) and open TLIF group (88.4％).There was significantly different in the safe rates of pedicle screws between MIS-TLIF group (99.0％) and open TLIF group (94.7％).The mean follow-up duration was 27.8 months in MIS-TLIF group and 28.6 months in open TLIF group.The JOA scores and VAS of low back pain were significantly improved at the latest follow-up in both groups (P＜0.05).No difference was observed between two groups in JOA scores,leg pain VAS and lumbar interbody fusion rate during follow-up.However,leg pain in MIS-TLIF group was better than that in open TLIF group.No implant-related complication was observed in both groups.Conclusion MIS-TLIF can effectively decrease the surgical trauma and rate of complications,improve the safety of pedicle screws implantation,and reduce surgical-related low back pain.

Clinical research of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative disorders of lumbar spine

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

The Efficacy Analysis for the Treatment with One Cage and Excised Local Bone Graft in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The clinical outcome of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant system for recurent lumbar disc herniation

Application of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Thoracolumbar Fracture

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

The mid-term outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disease

Clinical Application of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Report of 21 Cases

Therapy effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technical on complex lumbar spinal stenosis

[Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation with Lumbar Instability].

Efficacy Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation

Preliminary report on minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal degenerative disease

Clinical research for minimal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via Quadrant invasive system in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

[Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assisted with Microscope in Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease].

[Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion].

Effect of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Comparative Study of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease

[Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion].

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treating Recurrent Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Disease

[Clinical Outcomes of Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Tube Work Channel System].