Abstract:Aim:To compare clinical effect,Range of motion(ROM) of the instrumented and upper adjacent level and complications between transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.Indications,advantages and disadvantages of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique were also described.Methods: Patient selection consisted of those presenting with low back pain or radiculopathy who have failed in nonoperative management at least 6 months.All patients had evidence of degenerative disc disease with interbody height loss or evidence of instability.This is a retrospective review of 71 patients with degenerative lumbar disease who were treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF group) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF group).All of patients were followed up,the mean follow-up time was 24months(range,12 to 36 months).The operating time,blood loss,postoperative drainage,postoperative hospital stay and complications of all cases were recorded.The function of lumbar was evaluated by Oswestry Disability Index(ODI).Flexion-extension radiographs were taken separately and Range of motion(ROM) of the instrumented and upper adjacent level were measured.The operating time,blood loss,postoperative drainage and postoperative hospital stay between TLIF and PLIF group were compared.ODI and ROM of the instrumented upper adjacent level were compared between in the TLIF group and PLIF group pre-and post-operatively. Results: There were 21 patients in TLIF group and 50 patients in PLIF group.The operating time,blood loss,postoperative drainage and postoperative hospital stay in the TLIF group were significantly less than those in the group of PLIF(P0.05).ODI of the final follow-up were significantly lower than preoperative in both groups(P0.05).Between groups,however,there were no significant differences neither at preoperative or final follow-up(P0.05).ROM of the upper adjacent level at the final follow-up in the group of TILF was similar to preoperation(P0.05),whereas,that in group of PLIF was markedly increased at the final follow-up compared with preoperation(P0.05).It was significantly higher in terms of ROM of the upper adjacent level at the final follow-up than preoperation in the group of PLIF(P0.05),though no significant differences were found at preoperation between the two groups(P0.05).All patients achieved fusion in the current study at the final follow-up,and fusion rate was 100%. Conclusion:The techniques of TLIF and PLIF are effective in treating degenerative lumbar disease,which have satisfactory clinical efficacy in short term.The operating time,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative drainage and complication using TLIF are less than that using PLIF.Compared with the technique of PLIF,the integrity of posterior ligamentous complex were retained more effectively through the technique of TLIF,and it also reduces the ROM of the upper adjacent segment.

[Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion].

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

MRI Changes of Adjacent Segments after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Foraminal Endoscopy: A Case-Control Study.

[Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Microendoscopic Surgery].

Clinical research of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative disorders of lumbar spine

[Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation with Lumbar Instability].

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using One Diagonal Fusion Cage with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Massive Lumbar Disc Herniation

Efficacy Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation

[Retrospective and Comparative Analysis of Therapy for Degenerative Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain with End Plate Modic Changes with Discography and Intradiscal Injection Blockage].

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: analysis of 18 cases]

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based on pedical fixation: Can it increase lumbar stability and fusion rate?

Laminectomy with Transforaminal Discectomy and Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation

The mid-term outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disease

Preliminary report on minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal degenerative disease

[Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Discogenic Low Back Pain].

Anatomic Investigation of Lumbar Transforaminal Fenestration Approach and Its Clinical Application in Far Lateral Disc Herniation

[Preliminary Clinical Results of Endoscopic Discectomy Followed by Interbody Fusion Using B-Twin Expandable Spinal Spacer].

Clinical Effects of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation Discectomy on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation and degenerative instability

Short-Term Therapeutic Efficacy of the Isobar TTL Dynamic Internal Fixation System for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases.

Comparative Study of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease