Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open TLIF in treating recurrent degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods Fifty-two patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar disorders were divided into two groups.Twenty-four (17 males,7 females with average age of 51.1 years) underwent MIS-TLIF surgery.Thirteen cases had the surgery at L4.5 and eleven at L5S1.The primary surgeries were discectomy in 6 cases,discectomy with laminoplasty in 4 cases,laminectomy in 5 patients,and laminectomy and decompression in 9 cases.The reasons of revision surgeries were recurrent of lumber disc herniation in 10 cases and recurrent of lumbar spinal canal stenosis in 14 cases.Twenty-eight patients (20 males,8 females with the mean age of 50.8 years) underwent open TLIF.Among them,one was at L2.3,2 at L3,4,17 at L4.5 and 8 at L5S1 level.The reasons of revision surgeries were misdiagnosis in 1 case (no symptom relief after surgery),recurrent of lumber disc herniation in 23 cases and recurrent of lumbar spinal canal stenosis in 4 case.The primary surgeries were discectomy in 18 cases,microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in 2 cases,discectomy with laminoplasty in 4 cases,and laminectomy and decompression in 4 cases.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score,the visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain were assessed during the postoperative follow-up.The lumbar interbody fusion rate and accuracy of pedicle screws were evaluated by CT scanning.Results The mean operative duration was not significantly different (P＞0.05) between two groups.The mean incision length,the average amount of blood loss,incision VAS at 1 and 3 days after the surgery were better in MIS-TLIF group than that in open TLIF group (P＜0.05).The seconds of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy were 80±9 in MIS-TLIF group and 10±2 in open TLIF group (P＜0.05).No neurological deficit was observed in both groups.Two cases had dura tear,two occurred surgical site infection in open TLIF group.There was no significant difference in the accuracy rates of pedicle screws between MIS-TLIF group (93.8％) and open TLIF group (88.4％).There was significantly different in the safe rates of pedicle screws between MIS-TLIF group (99.0％) and open TLIF group (94.7％).The mean follow-up duration was 27.8 months in MIS-TLIF group and 28.6 months in open TLIF group.The JOA scores and VAS of low back pain were significantly improved at the latest follow-up in both groups (P＜0.05).No difference was observed between two groups in JOA scores,leg pain VAS and lumbar interbody fusion rate during follow-up.However,leg pain in MIS-TLIF group was better than that in open TLIF group.No implant-related complication was observed in both groups.Conclusion MIS-TLIF can effectively decrease the surgical trauma and rate of complications,improve the safety of pedicle screws implantation,and reduce surgical-related low back pain.

The short-term effect analysis of MIS-TLIF in the treatment of recurrent intervertebral disc herniation

The clinical outcome of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant system for recurent lumbar disc herniation

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disc hernia- tion

[A Feasibility Research of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) Using Hybrid Internal Fixation for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation].

Disc Herniation in the Thoracolumbar Junction Treated by Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treating Recurrent Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study

Mini-open ALIF in the Treatment of Patients with Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease at more than 5 years follow-up:a review of 832 patients

Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Posterior Instrumentation.

[Comparison of Minimally Invasive Using a Tubular Retraction System Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases].

[Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation with Lumbar Instability].

COMPARISON OF SHORT-TERM EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY-AND OPEN-TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single Segmental Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

The Therapeutic Efficacy of MIS-TLIF for Patients with Sciatic Scoliosis Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Disease

[Comparison of Intervertebral Height and Lordosis of Fusion Segment Between Open- and Minimally Invasive-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions].

The Long-term Clinical Effect of Minimal-Invasive TLIF Technique in 1-Segment Lumbar Disease.

Ligamentum-preserved/Temporary Preserved Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Technical Note and 2-Year Follow-up

Microendoscopy-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Short-Term and Medium-Term Outcomes.

[The Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Lumbar Instability].