Abstract:Statement of problem. The accuracy of digital scanning for complete dental arch and implant-supported complete-arch restorations has been reported. However, research addressing the accuracy of digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation is lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of intraoral scanning, impression scanning, and cast scanning for complete-arch preparation.Material and methods. Maxillary and mandibular jaw typodonts with 28 teeth prepared for complete crowns were used as reference casts and digitized as reference data sets with a desktop scanner. Three digital scanning methods were applied. First, the reference casts were each scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner to generate the intraoral scanning group data sets. Second, the reference casts were each captured 10 times by using polyvinyl siloxane impression material, and the impressions were scanned with a desktop scanner to generate the impression scanning group data sets. Third, the impressions obtained in the impression scanning group were used to make gypsum casts which were then digitized with a desktop scanner to generate the cast scanning group data sets. Accuracy was determined by trueness and precision. Three-dimensional deviations of the prepared arches and anterior and posterior segments were measured from root mean square values and depicted on color-difference maps. Differences among test groups were analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Bonferroni test for normally distributed data or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for non-normally distributed data (a=.05).Results. The trueness of the maxillary arch was significantly higher in the impression scanning group than in the cast scanning and intraoral scanning groups (P<.05), but no significant differences were found among the 3 groups of the mandibular arch (P>.05). The precision of both arches was significantly higher in the impression scanning and intraoral scanning groups than in the cast scanning group (P<.05). Color maps showed horizontal symmetrical displacement in the intraoral scanning group relative to the reference data sets and within-group unilateral distal-end distortion. Irregular arch deformations were noted in the impression scanning group, and buccal and occlusal expansion occurred in the anterior-posterior direction in the cast scanning group. Pooled data for anterior teeth indicated that the trueness was lowest in the intraoral scanning group; however, that for the maxillary anterior teeth did not differ, while that for the mandibular anterior teeth differed significantly among groups (P<.05). For the posterior teeth, deviation was the lowest in the impression scanning group, and significant differences were noted in both arches among the 3 groups (P<.05).Conclusions. Of the methods tested, impression scanning was the most accurate for the creation of a digital cast of a complete prepared arch. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1001-8)

Accuracy analysis of reconstructed post model from dental post impression digitization

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Intraoral Impression in Implant Restoration

Accuracy of intraoral versus desktop scanners used in digitizing polyvinyl siloxane impression for fabricating a CAD‐CAM customized post and core

Accuracy of Three Digital Scanning Methods for Complete-Arch Tooth Preparation: an in Vitro Comparison

Accuracy Evaluation of a New Three-Dimensional Reproduction Method of Edentulous Dental Casts, and Wax Occlusion Rims with Jaw Relation.

[Accuracy of Intercuspal Occlusion in 3D Reconstruction with the Dental Articulator Position Method].

[In vitro analysis of the influence of different tooth positions and retention depths of the pulp cavity on the accuracy of digital impression of the endocrown]

Accuracy Of Digital Impressions And Fitness Of Single Crowns Based On Digital Impressions

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

Accuracy of three digital waxing-guided trial restoration protocols for controlling the depths of tooth preparation for ceramic veneers

Evaluating the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Intercuspal Position for Dentition Casts Aided by a Mechanical Appliance

A Method to Evaluate the Trueness of Reconstructed Dental Models Made with Photo-Curing 3D Printing Technologies

[Accuracy Analysis of Full-Arch Implant Digital Impressions when Using a Geometric Feature].

Comparison of the Accuracy (trueness and Precision) of Virtual Dentofacial Patients Digitized by Three Different Methods Based on 3D Facial and Dental Images

The Accuracy of Post and Core Fabricated with Digital Technology

Evaluation of Accuracy of Virtual Occlusal Definition in Angle Class I Molar Relationship

Modeling of digital dental articulator and its accuracy verification using optical measurement

Accuracy of Recording Edentulous Arch Relations Using an Optical Jaw-Tracking System: an in Vitro Study