Abstract:In Brief Study Design. A multicenter cross-cultural study to re-evaluate the reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Objective. To assess the concurrent validity and reliability of this instrument in mainland China. Summary of Background Data. The SRS-22 Questionnaire was developed to assess the health-related quality of life for patients with scoliosis in the United States. More recently, the reliability and validity analyses of traditional and simplified Chinese versions of this questionnaire were performed, respectively. However, with respect to the diversity of population and large proportion of rural patients in China, a multicenter study might be necessary to re-evaluate its adaptation. Methods. The original English version of the SRS-22 Questionnaire was translated into simplified Chinese. Considering the different health care systems in mainland China, the question 15 was modified; the respondent might be the parent if the patient was younger than 18 years. This multicenter study was performed by 13 scoliosis surgeons involving seven spine centers. The SRS-22 Questionnaire and a previously validated 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire were given to 391 patients with idiopathic scoliosis or congenital scoliosis without neurologic deficits. Of those, 136 patients were randomly selected for a second identical SRS-22 Questionnaire filled 1 week later and mailed back with a stamped return envelope. Results. A total of 333 patients fully completed both SRS-22 and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaires. Good consistency was observed for all the five domains of the SRS-22. Poorer internal consistency was found in questions 15 and 18. If question 15 was excluded, the α coefficient would increase to 0.68. The pain domain of SRS-22 had a high ceiling effect being 67.5%. The test-retest reproducibility was observed “good” in the pain domain and “excellent” for the remaining domains of SRS-22 Questionnaire. Good (10 domains) and moderate (23 domains) correlations were demonstrated while seven domains had poor correlation. Conclusion. The simplified Chinese version of the SRS-22 Questionnaire was re-evaluated by a multicenter study to respect the diversity of population and cultural differences in mainland China, which showed good internal consistency and satisfactory test-retest reproducibility. It might be useful for clinical evaluation of Chinese adolescents and young adults with scoliosis treated with bracing or surgery, although it also encountered previously reported difficulties with some of the items related to different cultures and health care systems. A multicenter cross-cultural adaptation of simplified Chinese Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire was evaluated for 333 patients including those treated with bracing or surgery in mainland China, showing good internal consistency and satisfactory test-retest reproducibility. It should be used to evaluate Chinese adolescents and young adults with scoliosis.

Pilot Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Buddhism Relative Questionnaire

The Reliability and Validity of Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-reporting questionnaire for the screening of mental disorder among community population

Evaluating Survey Items of Buddhism Religiosity in China

The Reliability and Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale(PHQ-9)in the Elderly Population in Community

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Benefit Finding Questionnaire for people with mental disorders

Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample

Reliability and validity of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version Self-Report Form in China

Development of a structured interview for the modified version of the Beth Israel Hospital psychosomatic questionnaire for alexithymia

PAM11 DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF THE BLOOD DEFICIENCY QUESTIONNAIRE (BDQ)

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22(Srs-22)patient Questionnaire

The Self-Compassion Scale is Not Validated in a Buddhist Sample

[Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Vestibular Rehabilitation Benefit Questionnaire].

The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and its Chinese version (C-SBQ-R): Further validity testing using the culture, comprehension, and translation bias procedure.

Validation of the Chinese version bodily distress syndrome checklist in Chinese out-patients of general hospitals

Re-evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Revised Defensive Pessimism Questionnaire(Social)

Psychometric properties of the brief self-report questionnaire for screening putative pre-psychotic states and validation of clinical utility in young adult