Reproducibility and Intermodality Agreement of L-BMD Measured by Two QCT Softwares

PENG Junhong,LIU Song,GUO Junlin,CHEN Xiangshu,CHENG Xiaoguang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2011.12.006
2011-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To explore the reproducibility and difference of lumbar BMD(L-BMD) measured by N-vivo(Image analysis,IA) and QCT Pro(Mindways,MW) ,and the feasibility of establishing QCT bone density database of Chinese population.Materials and Methods 204 subjects underwent quantitative CT measurements of BMD in the spine using 16-row Toshiba CT and IA QCT calibration phantom.After transferring CT images to the QCT workstation,the difference and relationship of BMD measured by two QCT softwares were compared.Twenty randomly selected cases were measured twice by different operators using each QCT software to test the reproducibility.Results There was significant correlation between two measurements in 20 randomly selected cases using IA and MW software.Correlation coefficient was 0.998(P<0.01) showing high reproducibility.There was no significant difference between two measurements(P>0.05) .For agreement,there was significant correlation between the measurements using IA and MW software in 204 patients.Correlation coefficient was 0.995(P<0.01) .There was no significant difference in L-BMD between these two QCT softwares(P>0.05) .Conclusion Quantitative CT analysis softwares such as IA and MW do not have significant differences in L-BMD measurements with good reproducibility and intermodality agreement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?