“Double sweet spot” identification method via cluster analysis of petrophysical properties from well logg data: A case study of a tight sandstone reservoir
Xiaofeng Zhou,Jianguang Wei,Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam,Abdumalik Gayubov,Mehdi Ostadhassan,Yinghe Chen,Yuan Wang,Bo Yang,Ibragimov Jovdat Jamshid ogli,Baoping Pu,Xiao Zhang,Songze Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211821
2023-04-01
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Abstract:In recent years, interest in unconventional resource plays has grown substantially due to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques. However, the high cost of drilling, choosing the right locations for perforation intervals during hydraulic fracturing is a crucial issue. Therefore, identifying so called “sweet spot” with high potential for hydrocarbon production plays an important role in oil and gas industry. In this study a new “double sweet spot” identification method using cluster analysis of well-logged petrophysical properties of facies is presented. Firstly, an engineering sweet spot identification method based on geophysical responses parameters (brittleness index and permeability) is introduced to classify the target zone. Triaxial compression tests are performed to obtain the static Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of the rock samples. To calculate dynamic Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio, a novel model for determining interval transit time of S-wave is proposed based on the multiple linear regression theory according to well logging data. By performing the cluster analysis, an intersection diagram of permeability and calculated normalized Rickman's brittleness is built and then engineering sweet spots in target zone are characterized based on well-logged petrophysical properties of facies. By plotting the intersection diagram of porosity and oil saturation based on the cluster analysis theory, geological sweet spots in target zone were characterized and four types of rock petrophysical facies are divided: Sandstone A (So>48%, 8<φ<19%); Sandstone B (31<So<48%, 6<φ<18%); Sandstone C (18<So<31%, 8<φ<20%) and Sandstone D (0<So<18%, 8<φ<17%). Secondly, target formation classification is carried out using a proposed geological sweet spot identification method based on reservoir physical parameters (oil saturation and porosity). The relationship between core electrical resistivity and water saturation is determined by traditional Archie's formula and then an oil saturation prediction model in target reservoir is established. Based on the experimental porosity and permeability measurements of 47 core samples and well logging data, a porosity interpretation model is proposed. By plotting the intersection diagram of porosity and oil saturation based on the cluster analysis theory, geological sweet spots in target formation are characterized and four types of rock petrophysical facies are given: Sandstone A (K>0.1mD, BI>38); Sandstone B (K>0.1mD, 33<BI<38); Sandstone C (K>0.1mD, BI<33) and Sandstone D (0.01