Meta-analysis of Research Paradigm in Distance Education Journals
Xiaoying Feng,Qiuju Li,Yue Chen,Yue Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2015.12.008
2015-01-01
Abstract:The rapid development of distance education research in recent decades called for more review and reflection on it, especially on the research method and research route. This research used meta-analysis to study 3504 papers published on 8 Chinese core periodicals in recent ifve years (2010-2014), analyzing their paradigms, methods, topics and speciifcation in a research paradigm perspective. The study found that, papers of four research paradigms, including positivism, constructivist, critical and pragmatic, counted 40% of all papers in these periodicals. Different kinds of methods were used and various topics were covered. Papers of positivism research complied with the academic specifications best in four paradigm papers. Five suggestions were given for distance education periodicals and researchers in China based on international distance education journals and the present situation of academic research, which are: improving the maturity, iftness, diversity, speciifcation and preciseness.