Utilitarianism and Interpersonally Comparable Cardinal Utility: Some Implications of Just Perceivable Increments of Happiness

Yew-Kwang Ng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4144-4_6

2000-01-01

Abstract: We are all humans and hence not infinitely sensitive. If you enjoy a cup of coffee of given volume and strength best with two spoons of sugar in it, you probably cannot discern a difference between 1.99 and 2 spoons. While Borda (1781) had a discussion of a roughly similar concept, Edgeworth (1881) gave a more elaborate discussion of this just perceivable increment of enjoyment. (Thus, when I presented a seminar on this issue in 1974 at Nuffield College, Oxford, a student said, ‘why can’t you wait a few more years until 1981?’) Edgeworth used the term ‘pleasure’ which may be interpreted as somewhat narrow and have some negative, hedonistic implication as understood by lay people, though not so by moral philosophers. To me, there is nothing wrong with hedonism, properly understood. Still, using ‘enjoyment’ or ‘happiness’ instead may be better, though they really mean the same thing with appropriate interpretation.