Abstract:Value-based decision-making is of central interest in cognitive neuroscience and psychology, as well as in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders characterised by decision-making impairments. Studies examining (neuro-)computational mechanisms underlying choice behaviour typically focus on participants' decisions. However, there is increasing evidence that option valuation might also be reflected in motor response vigour and eye movements, implicit measures of subjective utility. To examine motor response vigour and visual fixation correlates of option valuation in intertemporal choice, we set up a task where the participants selected an option by pressing a grip force transducer, simultaneously tracking fixation shifts between options. As outlined in our preregistration (https://osf.io/k6jct), we used hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation to model the choices assuming hyperbolic discounting, compared variants of the softmax and drift diffusion model, and assessed the relationship between response vigour and the estimated model parameters. The behavioural data were best explained by a drift diffusion model specifying a non-linear scaling of the drift rate by the subjective value differences. Replicating previous findings, we found a magnitude effect for temporal discounting, such that higher rewards were discounted less. This magnitude effect was further reflected in motor response vigour, such that stronger forces were exerted in the high vs. the low magnitude condition. Bayesian hierarchical linear regression further revealed higher grip forces, faster response times and a lower number of fixation shifts for trials with higher subjective value differences. An exploratory analysis revealed that subjective value sums across options showed an even more pronounced association with trial-wise grip force amplitudes. Our data suggest that subjective utility or implicit valuation is reflected in motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns during intertemporal choice. Taking into account response vigour might thus provide deeper insight into decision-making, reward valuation and maladaptive changes in these processes, e.g. in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders. Value-based decision-making is a process of particular interest in cognitive neuroscience. Impairments in decision-making are hallmarks of several neuropsychiatric disorders, and specifically temporal discounting, i.e. the devaluation of future rewards, is discussed as a potential marker for psychiatric disorders. Subjective utility during value-based decision-making is commonly inferred on the basis of participants' choices only. Here were investigated if motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns may serve as additional and implicit measures of subjective utility during intertemporal choice. We demonstrate that motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns are related to the reward magnitudes and subjective value differences between options. Further, we show that the choice and response time data are well accounted for by a drift diffusion model including a non-linear scaling of the drift rate by the subjective option value differences. Our results suggest that measures of motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns may provide further insight on valuation during decision-making when combined with choice and response time data.

When is More Better?

Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance

The Cross‐modal Interaction Between Sound Frequency and Color Saturation on Consumer's Product Size Perception, Preference, and Purchase

Taking Decisions Too Seriously: Why Maximizers Often Get Mired in Choices

High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity

Impact of relative and absolute values on selective attention

Magnitude-sensitive reaction times reveal non-linear time costs in multi-alternative decision-making

Assessing “Economic Value”

The Divergent Impact of Reward Magnitude on Goal Eagerness and Effort Investment

A unified framework for perceived magnitude and dicriminability of sensory stimuli

When Choosing Makes a Good Thing Better: Temporal Variations in the Valuation of Hedonic Consumption

Sensitivity to the Instrumental Value of Choice Increases Across Development

Single-trial dynamics explain magnitude sensitive decision making

Which One Is Better,Maximizing or Satisficing?

Price Magnitude, Trading Behavior and Mispricing: An Experiment

Is 26 + 26 smaller than 24 + 28? Estimating the approximate magnitude of repeated versus different numbers

Magnitude processing and integration entail perceptual processes independent from the task

When (and why) absolute decision attribute values influence human preferences

Motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns reflect subjective valuation during intertemporal choice

Numerical values modulate size perception

Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making