Abstract:With the rise of unilateral protectionism and the blockage of World Trade Organization (WTO) multilateral trading system reform, the United States (U.S.) provides huge financial support to its semiconductor industry through the “Chip Act.” Besides, the U.S. attempts to improve the competitiveness of its semiconductor industry and dominate the international semiconductor market by setting up a series of “guardrails provisions” to curb the development of “foreign countries of concern,” such as China. Through documentary analysis, the main contents of the “Chip Act” are clarified, and its justiciability and compliance are analyzed from the perspective of WTO rules. In terms of actionability, the “Chip Act” meets the general conditions of subsidies and possesses the traits of specificity but at the same time causes damage to other countries’ industries, thus constituting an actionable subsidy. In terms of compliance, the discriminatory provisions of the “Chip Act” violate the principle of non-discrimination. Accordingly, China should actively respond under the WTO framework by promoting the resolution of the Appellate Body crisis and the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism as well as participating in subsidy reform negotiations and contributing Chinese solutions; China should also take the initiative to apply countervailing rules to the “Chip Act” while improving its own trade remedy system.

The “act of State Doctrine” As Immunity for the Extraterritorial Application of U.S.Antitrust Law ——comment on the Case “in Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation”

On the Legal Bases for some Chinese Enterprises against the American Court’s Jurisdiction in the Case of the Extraterritorial Application of American Anti-trust Law——Comment on the Case: American Consumers of Magnesite-based Products Brought Putative Cl

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

Antitrust control of mergers and acquisitions: a case study of China

Legal Issues on the Alleged RMB Currency Subsidy in the Countervailing Case against Chinese Export Goods in the U.S.——Comment on the Case in which the American Company Nucor Challenges the U.S. Department of Commerce's Decision not to Investigate an Alle

FG Hemisphere Associates V. Democratic Republic of the Congo

The Essential Facilities Doctrine and the Regulation of the Abuse of Market Dominant Position

Comment On: US International Trade Court Denied the Motion of Hebei Starbright Tire Co.for Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction in the New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires Antidumping and Countervailing Case

The Antitrust Law of Immunity and Applicable to the Salt Franchise

On the Pneumatic OTR Tires Case from a Multilateral Trade Perspective——And Analyze the Judicial Practice of US Anti-Subsidy Law

A Study on the Relationship Between Non-market Economies and Anti-subsidy Law——From the Perspective of the American Anti-subsidy Law

Main Contents and Problems of the U.S. “Chip Act” and China’s Response in the Context of WTO

The Economic Analysis of "337 Clause" about Appearing in Court According to Cournot Model

Antidumping Petition: To File Or Not To File

Anti-Monopoly Cases On Unfair Pricing In China

On the Conditions of Protection of Business Achievements Via the Anti-Unfair Competition Law--An Analysis of Some Leading Cases

Analysis on the Dispute between China and U.S. over Double Remedies

Comment on the Case:Big Sky Network Canada, Ltd. v. Sichuan Provincial Government

Antidumping duties and price undertakings: A welfare analysis

Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University School of Law, on the National Development and Reform Commission's Questionnaire on Intellectual Property Misuse Antitrust Guidelines

The Theoretical Sources of NME Rules under the U.S. Trade Remedy Law