Abstract:An age-old challenge in epistemology and moral philosophy is whether objectivity exists independent of subjective perspective. Alfred North Whitehead labeled it a "fallacy of misplaced concreteness"; after all, knowledge is represented elusively in symbols. I employ the free energy principle (FEP) to argue that the belief in moral objectivity, although perhaps fallacious, amounts to an ancient and universal human myth that is essential for our symbolic capacity. To perceive any object in a world of non-diminishing (perhaps irreducible) uncertainty, according to the FEP, its constituent parts must display common probabilistic tendencies, known as statistical beliefs, prior to its interpretation, or active inference, as a stable entity. Behavioral bias, subjective emotions, and social norms scale the scope of identity by coalescing agents with otherwise disparate goals and aligning their perspectives into a coherent structure. I argue that by declaring belief in norms as objective, e.g., expressing that a particular theft or infidelity was generally wrong, our ancestors psychologically constructed a type of identity bound only by shared faith in a perspective that technically transcended individual subjectivity. Signaling explicit belief in what were previously non-symbolic norms, as seen in many non-human animals, simulates a top-down point of view of our social interactions and thereby constructs our cultural niche and symbolic capacity. I demonstrate that, largely by contrasting with overly reductive analytical models that assume individual rational pursuit of extrinsic rewards, shared belief in moral conceptions, i.e., what amounts to a religious faith, remains a motivational cornerstone of our language, economic and civic institutions, stories, and psychology. Finally, I hypothesize that our bias for familiar accents (shibboleth), plausibly represents the phylogenetic and ontogenetic contextual origins of our impulse to minimize social surprise by declaring belief in the myth of objectivity.

The Presumption of Ethics

Moral instinct and moral judgment

When Are Norms Prescriptive? Understanding and Clarifying the Role of Norms in Behavioral Ethics Research

On the Method of Discovery and Proof in Ethics

Ethics:Science of Behaving or Governing

An Analysis of Moral Classification vs the Identification of Life Value

Beyond Whom and When

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

The Implication of Neo-ethics

Presumed innocent? How tacit assumptions of intentional structure shape moral judgment.

On the Nature of Morality

The Power and Pitfalls of Social Norms

On the General Principle of Moral

Moral Good or Moral Evil: Methods to Promote National Moral Character (3)

Myth of objectivity and the origin of symbols

The Moral Principle of Good

Moral Judgment and the Non-metaphysical Trend of Ethics

Principles and Duties: A Critique of Common Morality Theory

Good Moral: An Important Method to Improve the Overall National Character

On the Establishment of the Principle of Public Order and Good Morals

When I use a word . . . Academic norms, a scientific ethic, and the scientific conscience