Abstract:Scientific misconduct has been regarded as a problem existing both locally and globally. Over the past years, academic scandals have become such a serious problem that it is greatly jeopardizing the research integrity of scientific communities. In a situation like this, the establishment of academic regulations has become something that no serious researcher can ignore. From a philosophical perspective, it is argued that there are three fundamental questions that should be answered before any academic regulation can be introduced. These questions are: Why do we conduct academic research? What is it? How can we do it more scientifically? If we look at the issues related to academic regulations in a Chinese context, it seems that seeking a feasible answer to the question of “What” is more relevant and urgent, compared to the remaining two questions. Following this reasoning, our discussion mainly focuses on the issue of how to define academic practice. The present study covers six parts. The first part is a general introduction to the focus of the study. A case study of scientific misconduct is given in the second part. Calls for academic regulations and factors behind the misconduct are uncovered and discussed in the following two parts. The fifth part is the core part of this research in which the paradigm theory is adopted and a perspective of process-oriented development is introduced to look at the nature of academic training. Eighteen processes identified and analyzed in this part are: globalization, informationalization, netting, digitalization, philosophization, theorization, conceptualization, pioneering, problematization, perspectivization, focusing, structuralization, textualization, modularization, conventionalization, socialization, gaming, and normalization. We suggest in the concluding part that an ecological model of training be adopted so that a good balance can be maintained between technological delicacy and innovative research to reduce new misconduct in the scientific enterprise.

When I use a word . . . Academic norms, a scientific ethic, and the scientific conscience

When I use a word . . . Academic integrity—felonies and misdemeanours

Academic Norms of Humanities and Social Sciences in Western Developed Countries

Systemic Explanations of Scientific Misconduct: Provoked by Spectacular Cases of Norm Violation?

When I use a word . . . Academic curiosity

When Are Norms Prescriptive? Understanding and Clarifying the Role of Norms in Behavioral Ethics Research

Reflections on Scientific Misconduct in Management: Unfortunate Incidents or a Normative Crisis?

A Study of Paradigmatic Features in Scholastic Practice

Virtues and vocation: An historical perspective on scientific integrity in the twenty-first century

Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda

The (im-)moral scientist? Measurement and framing effects shape the association between scientists and immorality

The Power and Pitfalls of Social Norms

Positive Deviance Underlies Successful Science: Normative Methodologies Risk Throwing out the Baby With the Bathwater

Norm Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Social Norm Emergence, Persistence, and Change

What's in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change.

Social Responsibility Over Academic Freedom: Emphasizing Ethics and Codes of Conduct Geared for a Scholar’s Duties Towards Science, Society and the Education System in Twenty-First Century Science

Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values

Crime and punishment in scientific research

Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action

Research on the Classification of Domestic Academic Morality Norms

Finding the truth in science