Abstract:The abolition of the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China in Qi Yuling's case marks the end of the trend of developing a judicial constitutional review system in China, but issues of courts invoking constitutional norms in judicial decisions continue to arise. This essay investigates the actual situation of the Constitution in judicial decisions by categorizing 1907 court decisions that invoked the Constitution as the reasoning basis and the court decisions which invoked the Constitution as the decision-making basis and by exploring the logic of the use of the Constitution by Chinese judges. In the absence of a constitutional review system, the primary sense of Chinese judges invoking constitutional norms is characterized by "simplistic reasoning ", "politicized enforcement " and the "parent law " concept. The insufficient judgment reason is a universal feature of judicial adjudication in Chinese courts. However, due to the lack of a constitutional review system, the poor perception of the interpretation and application of the constitution may exacerbate the lack of legal arguments invoked by the Constitution. The political model of Constitution enforcement in China makes judges invoke the Constitution in judicial decisions by "asserting the prestige of the Constitution ", which leads to numerous errors in legal argumentation in judicial decisions. This also reflects the tendency of "political enforcement " to take precedence over the legal enforcement of the Constitution. The influence of the old "parent law " concept is that judges can arbitrarily apply constitutional norms directly to civil cases, including fundamental rights norms. By summarizing and describing the above three features, we can depict the activities of current Chinese courts in invoking the Constitution.

Miranda Rule's Application in the United States and Its Implications for Building of Rule of Law in China:A review from Florida v.Powell Case decided by the US Supreme Court in 2010

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

The Breakthrough and Progress in the Application Standards of Miranda Rule—a Review of J.D.B.Case Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2011 and Its Implications

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

Assessment of the Rule of Law and Its Application in China

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing...emerging Miranda research and professional roles for psychologists

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Establishing Judicial Review in China

Investigating the Effects of Repeated Miranda Warnings: Do They Perform a Curative Function on Common Miranda Misconceptions?

Politics Behind the Law: Unveiling the Discursive Strategies in Extradition Hearings on Meng Wanzhou

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

To Provide for New Rights or To Strengthen Remedies?

Discussion on the Application and Improvement of Criminal Trial by Default in China

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

Unpacking the Exclusionary Rule of Repeated Confessions in China

A Research on Constitutional Protection of Prisoners' Right of Access to the Courts in the U.S.:Taking American Constitutional Cases as the Object of Study