Abstract:Over the past three decades, the U.S. judiciary has grown increasingly less receptive to claims by convicted felons as to the conditions of their confinement while in prison. Although courts have not articulated a return to the "hands off" policy of the 1950s, it is clear that it has become significantly more difficult for prisoners to prevail in constitutional correctional litigation. The passage and aggressive implementation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act has been a powerful disincentive to such litigation in many areas of prisoners' rights law. From the perspective of the prisoner, the legal landscape is more hopeful in matters that relate to mental health care and treatment. Here, in spite of a general trend toward more stringent applications of standards of proof and a reluctance to order sweeping, intrusive remedies, some courts have aggressively protected prisoners' rights to be free from "deliberate indifference" to serious medical needs, and to be free from excessive force on the part of prison officials. A mostly hidden undercurrent in some prisoners' rights litigation has been the effort on the part of some plaintiffs' lawyers to look to international human rights doctrines as a potential source of rights, an effort that has met with some modest success. It receives support by the inclination of other courts to turn to international human rights conventions-even in nations where such conventions have not been ratified-as a kind of "best practice" in the area. The recent publication and subsequent ratification (though not, as of yet, by the United States) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) may add new support to those using international human rights documents as a basis for litigating prisoners' rights claims. To the best of our knowledge, there has, as of yet, been no scholarly literature on the question of the implications of the CRPD on the state of prisoners' rights law in a U.S. domestic context. In this article, we raise this question, and offer some tentative conclusions.

A Research on Constitutional Protection of Prisoners' Right of Access to the Courts in the U.S.:Taking American Constitutional Cases as the Object of Study

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

Right to Be Informed and Legal Safeguard thereof

The Constitutional Social Rights & Its Judicial Remedies:from the Perspective of Comparative Law

On Form Natural Justice to Due Process——The Transplantation of Legal Thoughts on the Legistation of Administrative

Prisoner' s Rights in the View of Contractualism

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

RESEARCH ON PRISON ARCHITECTURE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

Locked out of water: a reflection on WaSH access in US prisons

Research on the Protection of Rights for Defense Attorneys

The Intersection of Mental Health, Law, and Rehabilitation

The Gap Between Law And Practice: An Empirical Study On China'S High Pretrial Detention Rate

Setting Boundaries Between Crime and Rights

On Public Forum Doctrine in American Speech Freedom Cases——To Begin with Sam Case in 2009

Miranda Rule's Application in the United States and Its Implications for Building of Rule of Law in China:A review from Florida v.Powell Case decided by the US Supreme Court in 2010

The Criminal Law Dependence of Human Rights Protection and Social Governance: Centered on the Abduction and Rescue of People with Mental Disabilities