A Study of Longterm Quality of Life after Different Surgical Methods for Esophageal Cancer

Yao-qing YANG,Xiao-fei LI,Xiao-ping WANG,Yong HAN,Zhi-pei ZHANG,Qiang LU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2012.13.044
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the difference of long-term quality of life(QOL) of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer,two surgical methods were assessed in this prospective study.Methods: The quality of life questionnaire,EORTC QLQ-C30 Chinese version,was used to assess the patient's quality of life.All the 160 patients from April 1,2010 to April 1,2011 in our department treated for esophagectomy were collected in this study.The QLQ-C30 scores of preoperative and postoperative 3,6 and 12 months were compared with each other.Results: Compared with the preoperative and postoperative quality of life,we found that emo-tional function and physical function decreased significantly,dyspnea and pain were aggravated significantly,and fatigue and financial difficulties significantly increased in postoperative 3 months.Financial difficulties was restored at 12 months postoperative.Physical function,role function,emotional function and overall condition decreased significantly.That fatigue postoperative,and dyspnea 3,6 months postoperative was increased significantly in the pneumonectomy group.Conclusion: The preoperative and postoperative quality of life compared to removal of all non-significant impact on patients quality of life.Cervical esophageal anastomosis decreased the long-term quality of life significantly than that of the intrathoracic esophageal anastomosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?