Effect of Intrathoracic or Cervical Anastomosis After Esophagectomy on Quality of Life

Yong Ao,JiuDi Zhong,LeQi Zhong,KongJia Luo,Xin Zhang,XiaoDan Lin,ChuanZhen Li,TianZhen Yang,LiHong Qiu,ShiNing Li,Yi Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13770-3
IF: 4.339
2023-06-20
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:PurposeWe aimed to perform serial quality-of-life (QoL) evaluations and comparisons in patients after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (IA) or cervical anastomosis (CA).MethodsBetween November 2012 and March 2015, patients who underwent esophagectomy with IA or CA for mid-esophageal to distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were followed up. QoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-OES18) before surgery, at discharge, and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess the mean score differences (MDs) of each QoL scale between the two techniques, and changes in QoL over time. Potential confounders were adjusted.ResultsIn total, 219 patients were analyzed (IA, n = 127; CA, n = 92). All patients’ QoL decreased immediately after esophagectomy. Global QoL and most functioning and symptom scales exhibited a return to baseline levels within 2 years of discharge, except for physical functioning and several symptoms (dyspnea, diarrhea, dysphagia, and reflux). There was no difference in overall health score between the two groups (MD 2, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 1 to 6). Compared with IA, patients with CA reported more trouble with taste (MD − 12, 95% CI − 19 to − 4) and talking (MD − 11, 95% CI − 19 to 2) at discharge. No differences in long-term QoL were found between groups.ConclusionsCA was associated with more trouble with taste and talking in the short term than IA. The long-term QoL did not differ between the two approaches.
oncology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?