Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Safety after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis Versus McKeown—A Real-World Multicenter Observational Study from China.
Yang Liu,Yin Li,Xiangning Fu,Lunxu Liu,Lin Xu,Xiaofei Li,Jian Hu,Heng Zhao,Xun Zhang,Deruo Liu,Haiying Yang,Tong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.4052
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:4052 Background: Ivor Lewis (Iv) and McKeown (Mc) are two commonly used minimally invasive esophagectomy. Currently, there are limited data to compare effectiveness and safety between Iv and Mc in China. Methods: We conduct the study based on a national collaborative prospective esophageal cancer (EC) database (designed by LinkDoc Technology Co, Ltd.).EC patients who underwent Iv or Mc esophagectomy from Jan.2010 to Jun.2017 and pathologically confirmed stage Ⅰ~Ⅲ with middle thoracic and lower thoracic esophagus were enrolled. Log-rank test was used in the comparison of the two surgery groups. And Cox’s proportional hazard models and logistic regression were used in the factors analyses. Results: Total 1862 patients (1447 males and 415 females) were enrolled, mean age of 61.4.8±7.9. Among the patients, there were 97.2% squamous cell carcinoma, 1% adenocarcinoma and 1.8% others. 667 were performed with Iv esophagectomy and 1195 patients with Mc esophagectomy. Number of lymph nodes examined,mean was 14.4 ±9.02 in Iv group, compared with 21.5±11.57 in Mc group, p< 0.05. Recurrence rate was 12.3% in Iv group and 7.6% in Mc group, p< 0.05. The 5 years overall survival (OS) was 51% in Iv group and 59% in Mc group, p< 0.05. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for EC recurrence after esophagectomy include operation type (Iv vs Mc, odds ratio 1.70, CI 1.187-2.430), N stage and T stage, p< 0.05. Operation type (Ic vs Mc, HR 1.49, CI 1.153-1.928), N stage and T stage were hazard factors for OS in analysis of multivariate cox’s proportional hazard models, p< 0.05. Especially, for the subgroup diagnosed as stage T3 at middle thoracic esophagus, Recurrence and OS were significantly different according to surgery type. Median blood loss was 300 mL in Iv group compared with 200 mL in Mc group, p< 0.05. Post-operative complications was significantly less in Iv group, p< 0.05. Conclusions: Our data showed that Mc is preferred with better lymphadenectomy, lower recurrence and improved survival compared with Iv, especially for patients diagnosed as stage T3 at middle thoracic esophagus. And Lv showed significantly less severe post-operative complications than Mc. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1800014802.