Abstract:Objective·To compare the stress distribution at abutments, edentulous ridge, and peri-implant tissue under the vertical load between the RPI-type removable partial denture supported by implants with different diameter and the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture using a three-dimensional photoelastic method. Methods·The mandibular Kennedy I type denture defect models were fabricated according to the standard mandibular model. Four Straumann system soft tissue level implants with different diameters (two 4.1 mm implants and two 3.3 mm implants) were implanted into the bilateral first molar areas. Planting nails and epoxy resin teeth were inversely put into the mandibular silicone rubber molds to fabricate the epoxy resin photoelastic models and the regular neck (RN) healing abutments were screwed into the implants. A simulated alveolar mucosa with thickness of 2mm and a conventional RPI-type removable partial denture were placed on the epoxy resin models with or without implants. Then a force of 1 kg was vertically applied by a bite force loading device which fixed the model and denture in the centric occlusion. After the stress was frozen, model slices at different areas were cut and the stress fringes were observed. The stress was calculated according to the fringe value of per unit thickness. Results·For the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture, the maximum stress of distal abutment was mainly concentrated on the apical regions and the maximum stress of edentulous ridge was concentrated on the first molar area, particular on the lingual side of alveolar bone. For the implant-supported RPI-type removable partial denture, the maximum stress of distal abutment was lower than that of the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture, and the maximum stress of edentulous ridge (without the implants) was similar to that of abutment and supporting tissues and was lower than that of the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture. The stress around the implant was the largest and the peri-apical stress of implant was greater than the neck stress of implant. Meanwhile, the maximum stress around the implant was increased with the decrease of implant diameter. Conclusion·Compared to the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture, removable partial dentures supported by implants are more stable with a more balanced stress distribution in supporting tissues, thus benefit the health of abutments and supporting tissues.

3D Finite element analysis of bilateral distal-extension extracoronal attachment denture with different abutment periodontal quantity

Influence of abutment periodontal quantity on stress distribution in supporting tissue on extracoronal attachment denture with unilateral distal-extension prosthesis

Influence of Various Abutment Number on Stress Distribution in the Attachment Denture Supporting Tissue

Stress distribution in the supporting tissue with oblique forces on extracoronal attachment denture to mandibular Kennedy Ⅰ dentition defect

[The 3D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distributions in Abutment and Periodontal Tissues with Extra-Coronal Attachment].

Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis of Mandibular Unilateral Distal-extension with Extracoronal Precision Attachment

Stress Analysis of Precision Attachment Dentures for Mandibular Distal-Extension Edentulous Cases

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution about Abutments Periodontal Membranes of Separated Removable Partial Denture and Conical Telescope

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of removable partial denture with periodontally compromised abutments

[Effect of Stress Distribution of Support Tissues Using Attachment Prostheses with Different Number of Abutment].

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two kinds of extracoronal attachments in a new design to restore maxillary edentulous jaw

[Stress Analyses and Comparison of the Kennedy III Dentition Defect Restored with Removable Partial Denture].

3-D FEA of the stress state of abutment and its periodontal tissue with three different retention styles in the absence of mandibular anterior teeth]

Analysis on the Stress of Abutment between the Uses of Two Telescope Crown Dentures to Restore Distal-extension Caused ;by Periodontal Disease

Comparison of Stress Distribution in Abutment and Alveolar Ridge Between Two Kinds of Distal-Extention Absence Dentures

Stress analysis of distal-extension prosthetics with mesial and distal occlusal rest

Stress analysis of the supporting tissues for mandibular Kennedy ClassⅠ defect repaired with removable partial dentures supported by implants

Stress Distribution of Fixed Partial Denture Affected by Abutments with Absorbed Alveoli

Effect of Aveolar Ridge Resorption on Stress Distribution of Abutment and Peridontal Tissue of Attachment Denture

Influence of Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behaviour of Mandibular Implant-Retained/supported Overdentures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Three-dimensional finite analysis of the application of attachment for restoration of unilateral maxillary defect]