Abstract:Purpose: To compare the outcomes of implants inserted in maxillary sinuses augmented with 100% anorganic bovine bone (ABB) grafts versus mixed with 50% ABB and 50% autologous bone graft using a lateral window approach. Materials and methods: This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. Patients in need of an implant-supported prosthesis in maxillary posterior areas, with a residual alveolar bone height ranging between 0 and 4 mm, were recruited for lateral sinus grafting and implant placement. Patients were randomly allocated to receive two different graft materials according to a parallel group design: group A was grafted with 50% ABB and 50% autogenous bone; group B was grafted with 100% ABB. After 7 months, tapered implants were inserted with an insertion torque between 20 and 45 Ncm. Three months later implants were loaded with screw-retained temporary crowns. Definitive crowns were delivered after 3 months. Outcome measures were implant and prosthesis survival rates, complications, radiographic marginal bone-level changes, probing pocket depths (PPDs) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Clinical data were collected at definitive prosthesis delivery, and 1, 2 and 5 years after definitive loading. Results: Thirty-two consecutive patients were treated with 32 sinus elevation procedures (16 group A, 16 group B). A total of 46 implants were inserted. One patient (with two implants) dropped out in group A, and two patients (with three implants) dropped out in group B. No implant/crown failed by the end of the study. Three complications (one sinus membrane perforation and two chipping of the ceramic) were observed in three patients in group A, versus none in group B (relative risk was 0.81; 95% CI 0.64-1.03; P = 0.225). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.18 ± 0.50 mm (95% CI 0.95-1.45 mm) in group A and 1.28 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 0.97-1.43 mm) in group B, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (difference 0.11 ± 0.22 mm; 95% CI -0.06-0.16 mm; P = 0.586). At the 5-year follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.37 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 1.13-1.86 mm) in group A and 1.42 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 1.17-1.90 mm) in group B (difference 0.15 ± 0.08 mm; 95% CI 0.10-0.22 mm; P = 0.426). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean PPD value was 2.70 ± 0.39 mm for group A and 2.54 ± 0.66 mm for group B, with no statistically significant difference between groups (difference 0.17 ± 0.39 mm; 95% CI 0.06-0.32 mm; P = 0.456). At the 5-year follow-up, the mean PPD value was 3.20 ± 0.44 mm for group A and 3.32 ± 0.49 mm for group B (difference 0.12 ± 0.43 mm; 95% CI 0.02-0.22 mm; P = 0.672). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean BOP value was 1.21 ± 0.79 for group A and 1.28 ± 0.68 for group B (difference 0.06 ± 0.49; 95% CI -0.23-0.25; P = 0.297), and at the 5-year follow-up, the mean BOP value was 1.77 ± 0.62 for group A and 1.91 ± 0.48 for group B (difference: 0.14 ± 0.51; 95% CI -0.05-0.33; P = 0.492). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the present data confirm similar clinical outcomes of implants inserted in sinuses grafted with ABB versus implants inserted in sinuses grafted with mixed 50% ABB and 50% autologous bone.

Evaluation of preliminary clinical results of different sinus graft materials for the sinus augmentation technique and simultaneously placement of implants

Changes in Bone Graft Height and Influencing Factors after Sinus Floor Augmentation by Using the Lateral Window Approach: A Clinical Retrospective Study of 1 to 2 Years.

Comparative Evaluation of Endo-sinus Bone Augmentation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting Using Two Radiographic Methods.

Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Without Grafting by Two Radiographic Methods

A clinical long-term evaluation of implants in atrophic posterior maxilla utilizing the sinus floor augmentation technique

A Pilot Investigation Generating An Alternative Therapeutic Strategy Combining Deproteinized Bovine Bone And Gelatin Sponge For A Novel Implant Material In Sinus Floor Elevation Operation

Sinus augmentation grafting with anorganic bovine bone versus 50% autologous bone mixed with 50% anorganic bovine bone: 5 years after loading results from a randomised controlled trial

Gene expression, micro‐CT and histomorphometrical analysis of sinus floor augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Dental Implantation: A Long Term Retrospective Study of Sinus Bone Gain

Sinus lift grafting with anorganic bovine bone vs 50% autologous bone mixed with 50% anorganic bovine bone: 2 years after loading results from a randomised controlled trial

The Influence of Residual Alveolar Bone Height on Graft Composition after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Xenografts: A Histomorphometric Comparative Study

Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.

A prospective study on the effectiveness of newly developed autogenous tooth bone graft material for sinus bone graft procedure

[Retrospective Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Endosseous Implants].

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

The transalveolar approach with the small segmentation method for inclined maxillary sinus floor elevation: A retrospective study

Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Changes after Sinus Floor Augmentation with DBBM

Evaluation of Two Configurations of Hydroxyapatite and Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate in Sinus Grafts with Simultaneous Implant Installation: An Experimental Study in Rabbits

A 6～9 years retrospective clinical study of implant in sinus-lifted maxillary bone

Grafting after sinus lift with anorganic bovine bone alone compared with 50:50 anorganic bovine bone and autologous bone: results of a pilot randomised trial at one year

Evaluation of Two Beta-Tricalcium Phosphates with Different Particle Dimensions in Human Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial