A 6~9 years retrospective clinical study of implant in sinus-lifted maxillary bone

Yan-xiang ZHU,Ran CHENG,Zi-tong LIN,Yong-bin MOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6264.2017.05.032
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of dental implantation in patients who missed at least one maxillary posterior tooth with insufficient maxillary bone volume over a time period of 6-9 years.Methods:In this study , 69 patients suffered from maxillary posterior teeth loss were enrolled , with 95 dental implants inserted from 2007 to 2010.For group A, 27 patients were placed 38 implants via maxillary sinus floor lift with bone grafts tech-nique.For group B, 17 patients were placed 24 implants via maxillary sinus floor lift without bone grafts technique . For group C, 25 patients were placed 33 implants positioned in native areas beneath the sinus .All patients were fol-lowed up for 72 to 108 months after surgery .The aspects of implant survival rate , peri-implant soft tissues status , patients'satisfaction degree , marginal bone loss , bone substitutes volume and maxillary sinus floor level were evalu-ated.Results:The total implant survival rate showed 97.9% with 2 implants failed in 6 months after surgery. There was no difference of patients 'satisfaction degree among group A , group B and group C .Similarly , no differ-ence of peri-implant soft tissues was found , which kept in good condition at 6~9 years after surgery .MBL was dis-covered with significant difference between 6 months and 6~9 years in the three groups and was not associated with types of surgery .Large parts of maxillary sinus floor were risen for group A .We found that the volume of graft mate-rials remained 64.23%at 6 months and 6.56%at 6~9 years after surgery.Conclusion:The results suggest that implants in sinus-lifted maxillary bone achieve good clinical effect during the 6~9 years follow-up.The rate of ris-ing maxillary sinus floor is increased after bone graft but bone substitutes are absorbed at a high proportion .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?